skuzzycuzz
Registered User
- Jan 7, 2012
- 247
- 154
Yeah as an extremely underwhelming one.I guess I could see us not wanting to bring up Gaudette cause he’s been up and down a lot but yeah Gaunce has proved himself as an NHL player already
Yeah as an extremely underwhelming one.I guess I could see us not wanting to bring up Gaudette cause he’s been up and down a lot but yeah Gaunce has proved himself as an NHL player already
The fact he is on a one way salary actually saves the Canucks money. Bring up gaunce or gaudette and they pay an additional $10-15K/ game.
Yeah as an extremely underwhelming one.
I’ll give you Schaller, but Motte is much more effective than Gaunce has ever been to date.He’s a solid defensive player and a much better option that someone like Schaller or Motte.
Well the player traded away, Chaput, has played 26 games in Montreal so we will get to assess whether Kero was worth giving up a player that is on an NHL roster.
Also can assess the Kero > Granlund evaluation that MS and some others have made.
Yet, there also has be some doubt that Kero see a minute of ice. If so, I don't see the point especially given this move definitely weakens Utica at a time when they are making a good playoff run.
At least Kero is new for Canucks fans. Granlund just makes us angryTo be clear, it’s Kero=Granlund. I think they’re basically exactly the same player.