SwedishFire
Registered User
- Mar 3, 2011
- 5,332
- 1,863
More than sucks. Finally a 3C comes that is easy to play with, and he gets q long time injury. Yikes.Oi. Didn’t hear that. That sucks. Running Malone and Shore down the middle isn’t great.
I wanted Guhle so bad. I watched a few of his games his draft year just by chance and immediately noticed him. Shea Weber esc player.I love Holloway too and no question he will be a great forward in the league eventually. But, Guhle looks great too. Diamond in the rough pretty much. Not the best offensive numbers. He needed a bit more of an eye test.
Swap zegras for Caufield. Zegras is massively overrated. Wallstedt wouldn’t move the needle though. He’s still years away.I want Guhle so bad. I watched a few of his games his draft year just by chance and immediately noticed him. Shea Weber esc player.
Imagine this team with with Zegras, Guhle and Wallstedt.
I was referring to who I wanted us to draft at the time of the draft.Swap zegras for Caufield. Zegras is massively overrated. Wallstedt wouldn’t move the needle though. He’s still years away.
Fair enough I always wanted Caufeild.I was referring to who I wanted us to draft at the time of the draft.
I mean in hind site sure haha on draft day i was cheesed Seider got taken early. It was Boldy or Zegras. Caufield wasn't on my radar but obv if I had the choice now I wouldve taken himFair enough I always wanted Caufeild.
Even on draft day I wanted caufeild. No idea how he fell so far being one of the best goal scorers to come through the draft in years.I mean in hind site sure haha on draft day i was cheesed Seider got taken early. It was Boldy or Zegras. Caufield wasn't on my radar but obv if I had the choice now I wouldve taken him
Maybe skinner should start every game. He might be tired but still better chance than with Campbell lmao
Unless you are an oilers fan in which case every “bad” win is remembered and brought up when disparaging the team that is.Not the prettiest win ever, but no one remembers at the end of the season.
Two points!
From a Montreal, and a long time general hockey fan's, perspective, it was a real treat to watch the elite level of play that the league's best duo, MacDavid and Draisaitl, can bring to the game. But the Oilers were playing a re-building, largely mediocre team with 4 very raw rookies playing that was improbably able to outplay their superior opponent for large portions of the game when playing 5 on 5 and remain competitive even in the face of having to deal with multiple 5-3 advantages which allowed the best duo since Crosby and Malkin ( Esposito and Orr?) at their prime to strut their unworldly talent.Well he was beaten cleanly and saved by the crossbar at 4-3 so
That’s a bit unfair considering one of them plays on a team, and frequently a line, with two of those players and one doesn’t lol.Now do each players statline for non-McDrai involved goals lol
To be fair, you were playing a team missing half its top 9 forward group.From a Montreal, and a long time general hockey fan's, perspective, it was a real treat to watch the elite level of play that the league's best duo, MacDavid and Draisaitl, can bring to the game. But the Oilers were playing a re-building, largely mediocre team with 4 very raw rookies playing that was improbably able to outplay their superior opponent for large portions of the game when playing 5 on 5 and remain competitive even in the face of having to deal with multiple 5-3 advantages which allowed the best duo since Crosby and Malkin ( Esposito and Orr?) at their prime to strut their unworldly talent.
This game was much closer than it should have been. That result was more a function of Edmonton's weaknesses than Montreal's strengths. As noted by others here, the Oilers don't have a championship level defence. Nor from what I saw, do they have the requisite goaltending. Some here have pointed out that Skinner was 'saved' by the crossbar on the Armia shot. That shot would have beaten most goaltenders. What was more illustrative of Skinner's weakness was the Danonov goal. You simply cannot kick out a rebound like that into the center of the ice. I for one have never liked Campbell as a front line goaltender. In Montreal's upset victory over the leafs in the playoffs two years ago, it was Campbell's penchant for giving up weak goals at the most inopportune time that was the difference. While Montreal lacked the skill to exploit the Oilers' weaknesses, much stronger teams will undoubtedly have more success in this regard.
In any event, congratulations on the win. It was a highly entertaining game where the clearly better team won. But when you have MacDavid and Draisaitl, the Oilers, in most cases, will be the better team. It's the other cases that the Oilers' fans should be concerned about.
That's the blessing and the curse of having two elite players like MacDavid and Draisaitl in a cap era. It greatly restricts a team's options. Its funny. From an Oilers' fans' perspective, with MacDavid and Draisaitl, you always believe you have a chance to win. From opposing fans' perspective, when you face the Oiler's goaltending, you always believe you have a chance to win.To be fair, you were playing a team missing half its top 9 forward group.
But yes, the defense and goaltending is not good enough to win a cup.
A bad GM has greatly restricted the teams options.That's the blessing and the curse of having two elite players like MacDavid and Draisaitl in a cap era. It greatly restricts a team's options.
I know this might sound stupid but the Oilers haven’t exactly been the greatest team this year but they are still keeping afloat. Having so many players injured right now has kinda forced the rest up the team to elevate just to scrape up these wins. I think once we start to see these guys get healthy we might actually come out of these injuries a better team than before they all went down.Any word on Foegle or Yam? I know Mcleod isnt close.
You can keep changing general managers, but the challenge of the mathematics doesn't. The cap has institutionalized parity (mediocrity).A bad GM has greatly restricted the teams options.
The defense could be improved substantially with the addition of a defensively solid #2LD. A guy like Gavrikov for example might make a big difference. It starts a bit of a chain reaction.From a Montreal, and a long time general hockey fan's, perspective, it was a real treat to watch the elite level of play that the league's best duo, MacDavid and Draisaitl, can bring to the game. But the Oilers were playing a re-building, largely mediocre team with 4 very raw rookies playing that was improbably able to outplay their superior opponent for large portions of the game when playing 5 on 5 and remain competitive even in the face of having to deal with multiple 5-3 advantages which allowed the best duo since Crosby and Malkin ( Esposito and Orr?) at their prime to strut their unworldly talent.
This game was much closer than it should have been. That result was more a function of Edmonton's weaknesses than Montreal's strengths. As noted by others here, the Oilers don't have a championship level defence. Nor from what I saw, do they have the requisite goaltending. Some here have pointed out that Skinner was 'saved' by the crossbar on the Armia shot. That shot would have beaten most goaltenders. What was more illustrative of Skinner's weakness was the Danonov goal. You simply cannot kick out a rebound like that into the center of the ice. I for one have never liked Campbell as a front line goaltender. In Montreal's upset victory over the leafs in the playoffs two years ago, it was Campbell's penchant for giving up weak goals at the most inopportune time that was the difference. While Montreal lacked the skill to exploit the Oilers' weaknesses, much stronger teams will undoubtedly have more success in this regard.
In any event, congratulations on the win. It was a highly entertaining game where the clearly better team won. But when you have MacDavid and Draisaitl, the Oilers, in most cases, will be the better team. It's the other cases that the Oilers' fans should be concerned about.
Ya we also had Gretzky and Kurri in a Pocklington cap era but we also had Fuhr, Messier and Anderson back then.That's the blessing and the curse of having two elite players like MacDavid and Draisaitl in a cap era. It greatly restricts a team's options. Its funny. From an Oilers' fans' perspective, with MacDavid and Draisaitl, you always believe you have a chance to win. From opposing fans' perspective, when you face the Oiler's goaltending, you always believe you have a chance to win.
Swap zegras for Caufield. Zegras is massively overrated. Wallstedt wouldn’t move the needle though. He’s still years away.
Eh it wasn’t really a gong show at ES. It was more of a gong show on the PK.Missed the game but just looking at the stats seeing that they were heavily outshot and depending a lot on the PP, I'm guessing that it was a gongshow at even strength. It's important to bank points regardless but they have a ton of shit to fix if they want to be anything more than 1st round fodder.
It was commented on numerous times during the draft that beyond Hughes it was difficult to tell which players drove the play on that powerhouse USNTP team. A team selecting between 5-20 could draft a Caufield/Boldy or Turcotte/York.Even on draft day I wanted caufeild. No idea how he fell so far being one of the best goal scorers to come through the draft in years.