How are the Ducks so bad if their players are so good?Lol at these Leaf fans that think Fowler would be #3 or #4
Lmao Fowler would be the Flames' #2 not #5Gio
Hamonic
Andersson
Hanafin
Valimaki
Fowler/Brodie
Kylington
Stone
Prout
Wouldnt take him over any of the 5 meantioned but he would probably play on the third pairing with Andersson since Valimaki's been injured
It's a very simple answer and one that has been answered a million times:How are the Ducks so bad if their players are so good?
Four top pairing defenceman and the best goalie in the league yet they are terrible.
Sounds like a cop out if I ever heard one.It's a very simple answer and one that has been answered a million times:
Randy. Carlyle.
DeAngelo is better than Fowler?In terms of usage, #1 because he has a reputation.
In terms of ability, #2/3 along with Shattenkirk.
DeAngelo is the only one definitely better.
Wtf kind of nicknames are those? You don't even have anything in your username or avatar to indicate the team you're referring to...He'd be behind Dewey. Probably ahead of AMart, but likely interchangeable
Lmao Fowler would be the Flames' #2 not #5
That’s a good question for Boston. Chara is no longer a #1. McAvoy is not one as of yet. Carlo looks good but Fowler is better.
So... #1, I guess?
Rielly
Gardiner
Muzzin
Fowler
Dermott
Hainsey
Zaitsev
Fowler #1 in Boston. #4 in Toronto. Makes sense to me.
Fowler #1 in Boston. #4 in Toronto. Makes sense to me.
They do have some very good players, but Fowler isn't one of them. Point totals from defensemen are significantly overvalued, especially when a significant amount come from the PP.How are the Ducks so bad if their players are so good?
Four top pairing defenceman and the best goalie in the league yet they are terrible.