Flamesfan62
Registered User
No, they can't. What're you talking about?You can have him for free.
No, they can't. What're you talking about?You can have him for free.
No, they can't. What're you talking about?
I like it for Calgary.
What is there to like about it from Calgary's perspective?
Our d takes a huge hit and we now only have 3 guys at an NHL level and 3 guys that will need a ton of sheltering.
We add Simmonds but either have no for him to play with (if he is on the 2nd line) or have no secondary scoring if he is moved to the top line.
I like Sanheim but with us trading away our 1st rounder this year it makes no sense to make deals for the future that make us worse this year.
I don't think that highly of Brodie, I don't think Sanheim is that big of a downgrade. Simmonds would look good on the Flames, and has some finish to his game.
Sanheim would be a pretty huge steal. Simmonds and Brodie aren't that far off in value.
Backlund>> Sanheim. Backlund isn't a middle 6 C. He's a very good shutdown 2C who produces well.
Said no real Flames fan ever.Jankowski sucks, I would give him away for free if some team wanted him.
Jankowski sucks, I would give him away for free if some team wanted him.
Said no real Flames fan ever.
Jankowski sucks, I would give him away for free if some team wanted him.
That's a big ifSanheim has top pairing two-way D ability if he reaches his ceiling. Thats worth more than a Backlund type.
Either way..Sanheim is worth more to the Flyers than Backlund based on our C situation.
Now that I'd have to think aboutSanheim and Simmonds for Brodie and a 2nd
Now that I'd have to think about
I know it favors Calgary, but that's why I like it.Don't bother - that's a complete non-starter from the Flyers.
Honest question then, why do you claim Jankowski sucks? He's a big center who has been improving lots every year, he has lots of skill and a wicked shot. Plus he's good in the dot and is only 23. He doesn't look out of place at all and I see him being a 50 point guy for us for a long time, maybe more.
It's just a lot to ask for, he's fully going off potential.Tell us why that is such a huge "if"
Honest question then, why do you claim Jankowski sucks? He's a big center who has been improving lots every year, he has lots of skill and a wicked shot. Plus he's good in the dot and is only 23. He doesn't look out of place at all and I see him being a 50 point guy for us for a long time, maybe more.