C/LW Matthew Beniers - Univ. of Michigan, NCAA (2021, 2nd, SEA)

Herby

Now I can die in peace
Feb 27, 2002
26,319
15,243
Mullett Lake, MI
Do you think he’s a first line or 2nd line C center? Bob McKenzie said he projects as a #2C.

Championship caliber 2C. The question is, is that what you are looking at picking in the top 3 like some project him to go?

I don't hate Beniers, but I still wonder if he's someone you want to take with that high a pick. Although if you are a team with an already elite or future elite 1C and need a 2C maybe he works for you. (Buffalo if they decide to keep Eichel)
 

lawrence

Registered User
May 19, 2012
15,996
6,787
In what world is scoring over a point per game as a freshman in the NCAA not scoring much??

might be the fact he also has 2 other top 10 prospects as teammates right now. Is he still a ppg guy without Johnson and Powers as teammates linemates? his upside is a number 2 centreman and he's one of the top 3 prospects then that really speaks for this draft wow... but we'll see.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Luckylarry

BondraTime

Registered User
Nov 20, 2005
28,620
23,309
East Coast
might be the fact he also has 2 other top 10 prospects as teammates right now. Is he still a ppg guy without Johnson and Powers as teammates linemates? his upside is a number 2 centreman and he's one of the top 3 prospects then that really speaks for this draft wow... but we'll see.
Speaks more to the evaluation skills of the internet
 

Ed Ned and Leddy

Brokering the Bally Sports + Corncob TV Merger
Apr 1, 2019
3,634
5,842
Detroit to DC
might be the fact he also has 2 other top 10 prospects as teammates right now. Is he still a ppg guy without Johnson and Powers as teammates linemates? his upside is a number 2 centreman and he's one of the top 3 prospects then that really speaks for this draft wow... but we'll see.

Most highly-touted NCAA prospects play on good teams with good teammates. Only a handful of schools have the pulling power to bring in players projected in the upper first round, and they're usually going to have a pretty good roster in place. Michigan is kind of unique in that it's freshman class is doing so much of the heavy lifting, which should be encouraging for these prospects if anything.

Personally I'd say that, between Beniers and Johnson, Beniers drives the line with his faceoffs, zone entries, forechecking, puck carrying, and general combativeness. In that sense, I'd say that Johnson benefits more from Beniers than the inverse. But they're really both just great prospects in their own right, I wouldn't worry about a Frk next to Mackinnon and Drouin situation here.

As far as the 2C upside goes, I'm not sure I'd limit him to that. I think he has 1C upside in the vein of guys like Ryan O'Reilly or Sean Couturier, although I don't think either player is a perfect comparison to Beniers stylistically. If he goes top 3 and ends up a good, all-situations 2C, I think that's a fine pick honestly. People overvalue high firsts in my opinion, outside of a McDavid/Eichel year it's pretty rare that the top 5 is littered with can't-miss 1C prospects. I think it's only every three or fours years or so that the first overall is a clear-cut franchise center prospect. Beniers is not that, but he's still a great prospect in his own right.

If folks are curious to what extent Beniers/Johnson/Power benefit from each other, I'd just recommend watching some Michigan replays this year. I think they're available on B1G+.
 
Last edited:

Juxtaposer

Outro: Divina Comedia
Dec 21, 2009
47,672
16,571
Bay Area
might be the fact he also has 2 other top 10 prospects as teammates right now. Is he still a ppg guy without Johnson and Powers as teammates linemates? his upside is a number 2 centreman and he's one of the top 3 prospects then that really speaks for this draft wow... but we'll see.

Sure, those are legit concerns about Beniers. I’m just responding to the claim that he’s not scoring much.
 

Preposterone

Registered User
Dec 6, 2013
782
901
might be the fact he also has 2 other top 10 prospects as teammates right now. Is he still a ppg guy without Johnson and Powers as teammates linemates? his upside is a number 2 centreman and he's one of the top 3 prospects then that really speaks for this draft wow... but we'll see.

Johnson is a really good NHL prospect, but he's not a dominant NCAA player as an 18 year old. Most top 25 college teams will have at least one or two upperclassman that are as good as him on their top line right now. Just on the wolverines, Bordeleau has been more effective than him this year
 

Herby

Now I can die in peace
Feb 27, 2002
26,319
15,243
Mullett Lake, MI
Saying he is a championship caliber 2C is not a knock. Mike Richards in his prime was a guy who you probably weren't winning a cup with as your 1C but he made the perfect 2C on a great team. There was actually a shift tonight where Beniers looked a lot like prime MR, he won a board battle in his own zone and carried the puck through the neutral zone and was able to get a scoring chance, it wasn't beautiful like a Stutzle carrying the puck, but it was effective. Also Beniers is a bit bigger than MR was, about two inches and probably ends up playing about 15-20 lbs heavier in the NHL.
 

DrSense

Registered User
Oct 4, 2017
783
899
I think there are valid offensive concerns. He has tunnel vision handling the puck. I don’t see him as a top six level passer of the puck. I also don’t see any standout offensive skill.

Next Jonathan Toews

I agree, that is the most valid comparison. Production-wise, in their draft year, very similar, although I'd argue Beniers made more of an impact on his WJC in his draft year than Toews did. I really don't understand the questioning of his upside. A ppg in your draft year in the NCAA is ridiculously good, as is being the #2 center on a gold medal winning WJC team. I mean, most draft eligibles can't even crack Team US or Team Canada, let alone be a pivotal player. His puck possession, zone entries and chances generated at the WJC were terrific.

From an upside perspective, if it is relative to being a #1 overall, I do understand the idea in that context. If you are taking him #1 overall perhaps that is the concern re upside in that he is not a Matthews, Mackinnon or McDavid talent, and not an Eichel either. But to me, there is clear #1 center upside with Toews like production in the 60-70 point range for a sustained period of time while driving the play at both ends. I think who ever grabs him at in the top 5 will be very happy.
 

Gopher13

Registered User
Apr 28, 2020
235
126
I agree, that is the most valid comparison. Production-wise, in their draft year, very similar, although I'd argue Beniers made more of an impact on his WJC in his draft year than Toews did. I really don't understand the questioning of his upside. A ppg in your draft year in the NCAA is ridiculously good, as is being the #2 center on a gold medal winning WJC team. I mean, most draft eligibles can't even crack Team US or Team Canada, let alone be a pivotal player. His puck possession, zone entries and chances generated at the WJC were terrific.

From an upside perspective, if it is relative to being a #1 overall, I do understand the idea in that context. If you are taking him #1 overall perhaps that is the concern re upside in that he is not a Matthews, Mackinnon or McDavid talent, and not an Eichel either. But to me, there is clear #1 center upside with Toews like production in the 60-70 point range for a sustained period of time while driving the play at both ends. I think who ever grabs him at in the top 5 will be very happy.

Pretty spot on. Beniers isn't the high end scorer like those you mentioned or even a Hughes or Lafreniere but he is a sound two way player who can play in all situations at a high level. To me he is like a Patrice Bergeron.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OgeeOgelthorpe

OgeeOgelthorpe

Baldina
Feb 29, 2020
17,179
18,274
Pretty spot on. Beniers isn't the high end scorer like those you mentioned or even a Hughes or Lafreniere but he is a sound two way player who can play in all situations at a high level. To me he is like a Patrice Bergeron.

If you're scaling Beniers I think we can look at his comparables like this.

High end of development: Bergeron, Toews
Meets expectations: ROR, Philly version of Mike Richards
Low end of development: Dylan Larkin, Ryan Kesler, Brayden Schenn

In a year that's looking light on high end talent I'd take this pick in the top 3. And if Detroit wins the lottery I'd flip a coin on whether they get Owen Power or Matt Benier.
 

flashsabre

Registered User
Apr 5, 2003
3,962
3,462
Visit site
You can only draft who is available. This is not a strong year so Beniers probably goes high and is judged at a different level then the player he is. Will be a coach’s dream and the type of player every team wants but not necessarily with a top 3 pick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: QJL

Pavel Buchnevich

Drury and Laviolette Must Go
Dec 8, 2013
57,673
23,615
New York
I think there's an inherent danger with marking Beniers down as a yearly Selke contender. It reminds me a lot of the discussion that penciled Sanderson in as one of the best shutdown defensemen in the NHL. The defensive part of the game is a lot harder to pencil someone in as NHL elite when they are still a draft-eligible prospect. It's much easier for the offensive side of the game. The defensive side of the game puts a much bigger emphasis on intangibles, hockey sense, intricacies of the game that are much harder to measure.

This isn't to suggest Beniers can't be a yearly Selke contender. He might, but even the guys who are now yearly Selke contenders weren't good enough to be penciled in for that when they were draft eligible. Otherwise, you aren't drafting Bergeron or ROR in the second round. When you draft Beniers in the spot you do, you have to prepare for the possibility he's merely above-average defensively. Can he justify his draft slot if he never becomes better than above-average defensively?
 

QJL

Registered User
Jan 2, 2014
6,225
4,515
If you're scaling Beniers I think we can look at his comparables like this.

High end of development: Bergeron, Toews
Meets expectations: ROR, Philly version of Mike Richards
Low end of development: Dylan Larkin, Ryan Kesler, Brayden Schenn

In a year that's looking light on high end talent I'd take this pick in the top 3. And if Detroit wins the lottery I'd flip a coin on whether they get Owen Power or Matt Benier.

I’d be shocked if Beniers came close to ROR, Larkin, or Kelser.

I see a peak matching last season’s Anthony Cirelli.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad