kelsier
Registered User
- Aug 17, 2013
- 4,280
- 1,741
Back in the FEL line up. Playing in third line between Ikonen and Salminen.
Peoples who commented Anton as a player
Jan Lundell ( Anton's father)
Tuomo Ruutu ( former Finnish NHL player and assistant coach Team Finland U20).
Ismo Lehkonen ( father of Montreal Canadiens player Artturi Lehkonen)
Sean Bergenheim ( former Finnish NHL player)
I think Lundell is really compete player especially for his age. He has every attribute you want in #1 C but i’m afraid him not having enough offensive talent to be #1 pick. I don’t think he has any game breaking offensive skills. He just does everything really well and he can be a C who can be dominant 200 foot player. He still has time to prove me wrong but i’m little suspicious his chances to be #1 pick because almost every year teams are looking for that game breaker with top pick.
Hmm. To me Lundell has the tools to be impressive offensively. From what I've seen I see more potential scoringwise than I did with, for instance, Barkov at the same age. I should add that I had a chance to watch Barkov A LOT more as I lived in Finland and was still in university (thus much more free time ) and it could also be the fact that Barkov is so calm and always makes the smart play rather than the "flashy" one, so I would be interested to hear whether others agree with your assessment.
I liked Mikko Koivu a lot in his draft year. But Lundell now is younger, more than a year away from his draft summer, and even more impressive. The issue he has now is that he can be a step behind the play on occasion. If Anton works on first few step explosiveness and skating stride he will be extremely good. Fix that and you have one hell of a player.
I think Lundell is really compete player especially for his age. He has every attribute you want in #1 C but i’m afraid him not having enough offensive talent to be #1 pick. I don’t think he has any game breaking offensive skills. He just does everything really well and he can be a C who can be dominant 200 foot player. He still has time to prove me wrong but i’m little suspicious his chances to be #1 pick because almost every year teams are looking for that game breaker with top pick.
Kakko didn’t exactly explode out of nowhere, he has always been one of the top players of the age group.Yeah he definitely is very complete player for his age. With that said, of course he's not going to display Kakko stylish dynamic highlight reels day in day out and in overall he's more like Barkov in that way - someone who's computing right decisions time and time again (and having few missed swings here and there). I think we should just be very content of seeing Lundell not only being able to play at this level, but to be able to actually perform better than most adults. Also it is impossible to tell whether that "extra offensive gear" comes out cause after all we are talking about someone who's still so young and playing against guys with years and years more experience. He might stagnate or he might develop further into something even more. Take Aho for instance, I doubt anyone expected him to become S.Koivu type of offensive juggernaut after his D year. Even Kakko for that matter, barely no one knew him before 17-18 until he just exploded in the JrA out of nowhere. Some players just bloom later than the others.
Lundell doesn't have to become #1 OA nor am I expecting it, but he has the tools to become a special player and even exceed our expectations if all goes great. Only time will tell.
Kakko didn’t exactly explode out of nowhere, he has always been one of the top players of the age group.
Not out of nowhere but his performance hasn't been very notable until the 17-18 season. Before then the production's in line for a middle rounder, perhaps.Kakko didn’t exactly explode out of nowhere, he has always been one of the top players of the age group.
The kid played U17 national team games as a U16 player lol..You're joking, right?
This is the first ever thread started about Kakko in the HFBoards:
RW Kaapo Kakko - TPS, Liiga (2019 Draft)
I'm sure you can look at the date on your own but as you can see the topic was started 8th of October 2017.
I don't even have to start digging into old scouting articles that were sighting into the future since if the Finns had a top prospect of his age group in the pipeline, the hype here would've exploded much, much sooner than it did (which in this case meaning sooner than 17-18).
The kid played U17 national team games as a U16 player lol..
Jesus christ, the kid has always been the top prospect for TPS, has always played with 00's and 99's. The fact that you make the year older national team especially in U16, proves that you are a top player from the age group. Just said that he didn't "explode out of nowhere" as the poster said. Also there are usually no articles in NA of U16 players from Europe, so that's just f***ing idiotic of you to say.So let's get this straight. Kakko (in your opinion) has always been considered as one of the top prospects of his age class. Why? Due to an appearance in grand total of three games as an underage prospect at the international level with the u17 team where he managed to score whopping zero points. M'kay. You have any other actually valid causes that would back up the claim? Also since apparently he was widely known commodity I'm sure you have no problems presenting us some actual written (prior to season 17-18) articles that would support this statement? Preferably by North American authors, since we're not talking about FEL draft 2019, but NHL draft 2019. Geez, can't believe I've missed all this. xD
Jesus christ, the kid has always been the top prospect for TPS, has always played with 00's and 99's. The fact that you make the year older national team especially in U16, proves that you are a top player from the age group. Just said that he didn't "explode out of nowhere" as the poster said. Also there are usually no articles in NA of U16 players from Europe, so that's just ****ing idiotic of you to say.
16-17 season there were only 3 players with Kakko who played in the A-SM: Kokkonen, Aaltonen and Nikkanen.
Just stop, you've lost already if you think that he wasn't a top prospect already at U16 age.
Leevi Aaltonen did it too, and he's some third, fourth rounder? Do you realize we're not talking about "TPS's top prospect" but on the world level?Jesus christ, the kid has always been the top prospect for TPS, has always played with 00's and 99's. The fact that you make the year older national team especially in U16, proves that you are a top player from the age group.
Yeah, of course I do? He was a top prospect in Finland, I would have then placed him in the top 30 prospects in the world, which I would say is a top prospect.Leevi Aaltonen did it too, and he's some third, fourth rounder? Do you realize we're not talking about "TPS's top prospect" but on the world level?