- Sep 27, 2017
- 5,391
- 2,734
Outside of his shot, I wouldnt say he has any serious weakness in him. Thats why he was a first round pick. If he had an elite shot, leading him to score a bunch of goals combined with his lack of other weaknesses he was probably a top 7 or 8 pick.
It is true that hes a well rounded player, making him a safe bet to be an NHLer, but it is also a reason to have him lower in the first as well. That is perfect justification for scouts having him lower.
You dont consistently score a lot without an elite shot or net front play in the NHL, you dont consistently dangle around NHL dmen with good but not great hands, you dont consistently put up 50 assists without elite vision. But with all of these skills being pretty good, you can be a well rounded, impact player that just isnt the very top of the league. You could havea few seasons where something really clicks and you produce at a first line level but its not as easy to continue without an elite skill to rely on.
Veleno has plenty of time to develop some of these aspects and I think he was drafted a bit lower than he should've been, but hes also not some stud, blue chip guaranteed top line center either
I can see him as a Jordan Staal, good for 35-50 points, good defense, and anchoring a third line that gives a good team a ton of scoring depth.
All we can say is that he was very good at the Traverse City tournament. For my money, he was Detroit's best player. That's a good sign.
I’m not seeing the Jordan Staal comparisons. Staal is a lot bigger, not as good a skater, and more shoot-first. If I had to compare him to an NHLer, I’d say his upside is along the lines of ... a more pass first Adam Henrique? A more physical Filppula? Something like that.
All we can say is that he was very good at the Traverse City tournament. For my money, he was Detroit's best player. That's a good sign.
I’m not seeing the Jordan Staal comparisons. Staal is a lot bigger, not as good a skater, and more shoot-first. If I had to compare him to an NHLer, I’d say his upside is along the lines of ... a more pass first Adam Henrique? A more physical Filppula? Something like that.
Very good ? Second half ?
He was good for a dozen games, where he posted something like 20 points in 10ish games, and he was back to being PPG, like in SJ.
He also did nothing at the U18.
And this is not me statswatching, Ive actually commented on this live, during the U18, just check the habs board for my (And about a dozen other regular) comments about him, we all agreed he pretty much was a 30th or so prospect in value, and thats where he was picked, which is fine, just don't make him out to be something he isn't.
Matt Cullen and Dainius Zubrus have played significantly longer than guys like Larmer, Federko, Mogilny, Stastny, and Kariya (even if his career was shortened mainly due to injury).I will repeat
his nhl career will be longer than wahlstroms/hayton and farabees
There’s not a perfect 1:1, but offensively he reminds me of Derrick Brassard.
Matt Cullen and Dainius Zubrus have played significantly longer than guys like Larmer, Federko, Mogilny, Stastny, and Kariya (even if his career was shortened mainly due to injury).
Don’t get me wrong, I love Veleno and I think he can prove to people that he should’ve gone top-10. But that’s just a weird statement to make.
NHL scouts don't care about 14-year-olds or the expectations placed on them. Figuring out this years draft board for an NHL team is such a burden that they aren't really paying attention much past what is draft eligible. They'd actually be surprised talking to people here that we know about these kids. NHL scouts really don't give a shit about a prospect until he plays in Major Junior, and even then, that's minor until they are in their draft season.Veleno will be the steal from the wings, not Zadina. people didn't believe. the hate on Veleno was so uncalled for, Only because he was not a shiny new toy for scouts and they had him on their radar since he was 14 year old!
i kind of want to disagree with this. Not that i think all scouts are good. i feel like the whole "behind the scene" in an organisation are getting old and washed up. this sports needs fresh new eyes, People who started watching the game in the new era. Some scouts/management are still in the past. These guys are constantly watching game from around the world. saying they don't know players like most geeks do here is kinda not true, are they better to evaluate them? thats hella arguable, being a scout is not something you study for, it's a mix of free hard work, connection, timing basicly all the stars lined up, so of course some casual people could be better at evaluating talent.NHL scouts don't care about 14-year-olds or the expectations placed on them. Figuring out this years draft board for an NHL team is such a burden that they aren't really paying attention much past what is draft eligible. They'd actually be surprised talking to people here that we know about these kids. NHL scouts really don't give a **** about a prospect until he plays in Major Junior, and even then, that's minor until they are in their draft season.
It is a waste of time for NHL scouts to scout 14-year-olds. Unless we are talking guys who recently got NHL gigs after working on the major junior side, they simply don't care about a kid in bantam. There is no reason for them to rank them, or waste their time scouting them. Its better served being on the road. Your point was about NHL scouts and paying attention to 14 year olds. They don't. Its hard enough to keep track of the 100 or so draft eligible kids in your region before burdening yourself with someone in junior. These guys are trying to nail 7th round picks, not figure out who might go number 1 3 three years down the line.i kind of want to disagree with this. Not that i think all scouts are good. i feel like the whole "behind the scene" in an organisation are getting old and washed up. this sports needs fresh new eyes, People who started watching the game in the new era. Some scouts/management are still in the past. These guys are constantly watching game from around the world. saying they don't know players like most geeks do here is kinda not true, are they better to evaluate them? thats hella arguable, being a scout is not something you study for, it's a mix of free hard work, connection, timing basicly all the stars lined up, so of course some casual people could be better at evaluating talent.
So i still stand by my point, i realy feel like Veleno has been on the radar and since he didn't KILL everything like he was suppose to as a exeptional Q player, they got bored. it's crazy to say but people have been saying Veleno had a down year... If you take a look at his PPG on drummondville alone and put them at 57games (same numbers of game zadina played and posted 82pts) he does the EXACT same points. Veleno is the Center, he's a tier above Zadina defensive wise, has the way better all around game and translatable game. Yet Zadina had an AMAZING season. i feel like it's a bit ironic.
i got called crazy saying Veleno's floor was 55pts Two-way center after he got drafted. (yes floor, as in bare minimum)