Proposal: Byfield for Petterson

Neutrinos

Registered User
Sep 23, 2016
8,610
3,610
The NHL says "No" because of the salary cap...

The Kings would need to unload additional salary in order to be cap compliant
 
  • Like
Reactions: bossram

bringbacktheskate604

Registered User
Jul 20, 2022
891
1,000
Who says no?
The team with the 100+ point 25 year old centre. Byfield has done nothing to be remotely close to being on EP's level.

For the people who say well he's gonna get paid so that plays into it, that makes no sense. To not get paid means failure. As for potential being a factor, why would someone possibly hitting be worth more than someone who has.

It's like the people who say they wouldn't trade Power or Sanderson for Quinn because one day there's a small chance they reach his level. Never got that way of thinking.
 

Ryder71

Registered User
Nov 24, 2017
23,230
11,213
PIt D is having one hell of a year though, no joke. He's been behind Sid and Jake our best player. Easily our best defensemen this year.
 

HairyKneel

Registered User
Jun 5, 2023
1,087
962
Bookmark it now

Byfield in 2 years > EP40
Based on what? I like QB but this post is asinine.

If Peter doesn’t want to re-up here they move him at the draft. Should be a hell of a haul if they do trade him. Hopefully Allvin is smarter than Brad Treliving. The return for MT was a joke.
 

Zonk

Registered User
Jul 2, 2012
914
950
The team with the 100+ point 25 year old centre. Byfield has done nothing to be remotely close to being on EP's level.

For the people who say well he's gonna get paid so that plays into it, that makes no sense. To not get paid means failure. As for potential being a factor, why would someone possibly hitting be worth more than someone who has.

It's like the people who say they wouldn't trade Power or Sanderson for Quinn because one day there's a small chance they reach his level. Never got that way of thinking.
It appears that you do not understand the logic behind these views. This training video may help to explain it.

 

FSL KINGS

Registered User
May 10, 2021
2,576
2,295
He’s an RFA so the Canucks have at least one year of control (if he takes his qualifying offer). We will trade him if he doesn’t sign for more than a year this summer.
Even better! Take a qualifying offer then the King's have time to clear up the space.
 

dabeechman

Registered User
Sep 12, 2006
4,931
232
If LA has to include Clarke and Kaliyev as a sweetener to take on a .5ppg underperforming PLD, I am fairly confident they'll pass on that.

Edit: Blake is pretty stupid though, so you may be on to something.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad