No.
Bure had 37 pts more than the next closest player on the Nucks and the difference between that Canucks team and the Wings with Yzerman and Coffey was much different IMO.
Gretzky won the Ross.
Hasek and Vanbiesbrouck’s teams were totally different than the Preds.
Fed had 120, Yzerman had 82(he missed a lot time with injury)
Ray Sheppard was 2nd place and had 93
Federov finished 27p ahead of 2nd place on his team(Sheppard), all the while playing great defensively
Florida allowed 233ga, Buffalo 218, Nashville(in 12) 210.
You think a goalie playing in all but 9games, and maintaining a .930 is because the team was so much better? Really?
That Predators team scored 237 goals, Florida(94) scored 233, and Buffalo(94) 282.
They(nsh 12) were led in scoring by Martin Erat with 58p, yes they had Suter and Weber but quite literally nothing else. Rinne is just as responsible for dragging that team to the PO as Hasek was in 94, more so really, because if he didn't play, Nashville lost (5w 8l with Lindback in net) buffalo had Fuhr going 13 and 12
Rinne face over 2000 shots, so did Smith in Phoenix both rocked a .930 that year as well. (more than both hasek and Bies)
Never mind that Smith then rocked a .944 through 16PO games, Rinne a .929 through 10 games while Vanbiesbrouck didn't even play a PO game, and Hasek a .944 in 7.
Gretzky won the Ross but went nowhere.
The Wings were the 11th worst defensive team in the NHL, (the nucks 10th by 1ga) The kings the 3rd worst allow 47goals more than the wings.
The Wings outscored their horrible goaltending and defense, and the reason they could do that was Federov carried that team.
Gretzky couldn't do that with Kurri, Robitallie and Blake as his supporting cast.
Yes Buffalo was largely carried by Hasek, and you could maybe make a case for him if you squint your eyes just right.
There is 0 justification for VanBiesbrouck, or Gretzky, and Bure couldn't hold a candle to what Fed did that season.