Back tracks on what?
This was the source of all the fuss:
That is all of it.
Best I can tell, he posted a number and stood behind that number.
i actually quite appreciate the stand he took in his follow up/
Back tracks on what?
This was the source of all the fuss:
That is all of it.
Best I can tell, he posted a number and stood behind that number.
Un-tradable is to Buff as -All of this and in my opinion I still do not think Byfuglien is untradeable, as Lawless suggests
All of this and in my opinion I still do not think Byfuglien is untradeable, as Lawless suggests. I still believe there will be teams out there who will drool over Dustin Byfuglien's talents, size (yes... size), and Stanley Cup ring on his finger. A GM like Paul Holmgren, just for example, may be a firm believer that if he can get his hands on Dustin Byfuglien in a Flyers uniform, it could all come together and click for Big Buff.
I think Lawless is fooling himself when he says...
Seriously, every damn GM around the league knows Dustin Byfuglien is built like no other NHL'er out there, for better or for worse. And at the end of the day, his resume, point totals, ice-time logged, among other statistics, speak for themselves. There will be a GM out there who will pony up and pay for the services of #33 if Cheveldayoff so chooses to deal him, his weight be damned - in my opinion.
As for trading him, Chevy isn't going to give him away. So unless a GM gives Chevy what he wants, Byfuglien will remain a Jet in my view. With that being said, I still think Byfuglien (and Burmistrov) will be dealt this summer, perhaps in a couple weeks at the NHL Draft. As I have mentioned previously, this team needs some changes and tinkering, and adjusting the core with these two in my eyes is a fine place to start. One thing I will say, is if Chevy does deal Byfuglien, he's got some work to do in order to make that defence viable given Hainsey is also unlikely to be back, depending on what the return is for Byfuglien, of course (forward, defence).
I think it could be an interesting summer, or next couple/few weeks for that matter. We'll see.
We wouldn’t go that far, based on his talent and unique skills set. But there’s no question that getting a proper return for Dustin Byfuglien must weigh heavily on GM Kevin Cheveldayoff.
Great, even PuckDaddy is "reporting" on Lawless and the blogger now....
http://ca.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nh...end-winnipeg-season-131116224.html#more-60878
Difference is he doesn't think Buff is untradeable.
See just how quickly these rumors spiral out of control?
(Lawless goes to great lengths defending Pete Tessier’s reputation in the piece, which is probably why he left out one word in describing his hockeywriting career: HockeyBuzz, where Tessier blogs.)
Difference is he doesn't think Buff is untradeable.
Just kinda glanced over this thread but it seems waaaaayyyy too many people have a problem with his weight if it is true. Now, there is only one thing regarding him being able to gain weight as the season goes on, that one should worry about, and that's continually putting it on in the offseason and not come into camp at a half way decent weight. But we haven't seen him go overboard once with his weight coming into camp.
And if his weight peaked at the end, then that is one of the most astonishing things you could see in an athlete. His best play was at season's end. Once again, all he proves is it's his drive that is the only thing people should question about him. His weight is irrelevant for the most part.
Uh, why would we want to trade him?
See what Lawless does? Gets threads like this going. Hack of a journalist.
My buddy mentioned this to me this morning, my initial question was whether or not Lawless wrote the article.
I don't buy it.
What's not to buy? Somebody told Tessier something (possibly based on first hand knowledge, possibly with info picked up via word of mouth). Gary cited Tessier's as a reliable source of sources and wrote an article to cause a stir.
That is as good as Gary operating the scale himself. Right?
FWIW, I think Tessier is a pretty stand up guy.
This would be my recollection of Buff's conditioning......
I believe he trained under supervision during the summer and was in reasonable shape come September. When the lockout occurred he was no longer able to associate with members of the Jets organization. Hence, he regressed and was not in the same shape in Jan/Feb as he was in Sept. Joki, Pavlov, and others were not in playing shape when the season commenced. Hopefully, he trains hard this summer and comes back in shape.
I'm sure this was the case with some players on other teams as well. As for Lawless, didn't he go ballistic over the Kane/Las Vegas thing and try to run him out of town. Big apology later. Isn't he the one suggesting Noel will be axed? No talk about that now. Noel wasn't about to be axed, it was made up. Wasn't the bit about Burmi wants to be traded also from Lawless. He's a hack and keeping his Editor at the FP happy. He's also generating interest in his radio show. Does anyone here think he is a serious Journalist?
I agree that a trade is a possibility. I understand both both the pros and cons.We can quibble about Buff's actual weight, but the bottom line he is heavier than ideal and his conditioning can be questioned. He is in his late 20's and the likelihood of him changing his ways diminishes with every passing season. The question is do you take what you can get for him now and move forward or hold onto him and hope for the best.
IMO it is starting to look like Buff will be moved. I think he still holds a lot of value to a team needing an offensive d-man and are closer to contending. The Jets are better served by a young legit top 6 forward and a young defensive minded 2nd pairing LHD. If you can get some sort of combination of this I believe Chevy pulls the trigger.
Problem is he can't be moved in his current state.
I agree that a trade is a possibility. I understand both both the pros and cons.
What is oddd to me is that Buff being big isn't new. Gary has ragged on him about his weight before, recently even.
The number was the only new spin on the Buff bashing. The number supposedly made him harder to trade. I don't buy that part of it.
His current state is that of one of the best scoring D men in the entire NHL.
The is true today, was true yesterday and has been for the past 3 years. The idea that there is no value there is laughable.
Buff is still Buff. Buff has always been big. Nothing is news. Nothing has changed.
It's actually not that hard at all. Weight gain occurs mostly from over-eating and exercise has relatively little impact. For example, 30 minutes of NHL hockey probably burns not much more than 400 calories, whereas a pint of haagen dazs or a big mac meal will add on 1200 calories. Over the course of a month, a big eater could easily put on 10-15 pounds, despite playing pro sports. There is some metabolic selection bias in NHL athletes in that those who 'tend to put on weight' don't usually make it as far as Buff has, but it is mostly about nutritional discipline. The good part is that it can melt away pretty fast as well...with discipline.He gained 25-30 pounds in 90 days while playing over 1000 minutes of professional hockey? I don't want to say it's impossible but I don't see how he could have done that. That would be hard to accomplish unless all you did was eat McDonald's every day and didn't work out at all.
I quite agree, Gump, I would call Buff under-tradable, based on the above description, which ultimately does the organization a disservice.The point isn't really that he is untradeable per se, but rather, that he is "untradeable" when one considers the potential return of a fit Byfuglien in trade versus the current version. Near every NHL player is tradeable; the value of the return is the issue. I'm quite sure the Jets would prefer to garner the highest return possible if they were ever to trade him.
Agree with the above. He has under-performed during the second half of both of the past two seasons, and I am sure it is directly or indirectly related to wear and tear on his muscles, back and joints. The strain on joints rises exponentially with weight gain.Could not disagree with this more. The first 15 games of the season, he played like a Norris favourite. He was absolutely remarkable. He faded dramatically after coming back from his injury, and only seemed to get back on track in the last couple of weeks. Not to the level of early season, but like what we saw most of 2011-12.
This sums it up perfectly. The stuff about Lawless, while nowhere near the malicious levels of previous threads, is really not the issue here. The issue is that Buff is an immensely talented D, whose size will shorten his shelf life and decrease his optimal performance. Sure he's good, but he could be even better, for longer. That should matter to management and fans alike.No he doesn't posters on this board get these threads going. I originally posted this article on the back end of another thread earlier this morning with the naive though Buff's weight/lack of conditioning could be discussed without every 2nd post being about Lawless. He is a columnist who writes opinion pieces, he is doing his job. It doesn't mean that one of our most talented players couldn't be more with a better work ethic.