What has he done to justify that?
Poor BUF.
Cool.
Very good chance by the time his contract is over, he'll be the #1 best defenseman in this league. I don't see a problem with that
What has he done to justify that?
Poor BUF.
What has he done to justify that?
Poor BUF.
Cool.
Very good chance by the time his contract is over, he'll be the #1 best defenseman in this league. I don't see a problem with that
Wouldn't it make more sense on short term deals where if the potential is never hit, you aren't hamstrung by an albatross for an extra half of a decade?Paying for potential makes sense.
On long term deals...
And the fact he played under Krueger. How Krueger got a job and got to keep that job for that long... Is beyond me.I think people are forgetting he put up a 56 point pace the year before this one and had 44 the year before. One down year out of 3 doesn't mean he sucks especially since he still paced for 34 in his down year.