Judging an owner is usually done in hindsight. Nobody was criticizing him when he paid big money to keep Dareus and Hughes and get guys like Clay and Harvin. But when we don't live up to expectations, he gets a scathing article written about him. Sports writers have the luxury of a short term memory and while I won't click on this article, I'm willing to bet he didn't offer any solutions or specifics on what should have been done. Owners don't need to be football/hockey geniuses. They need to put the right people in positions of power, remove them
if necessary, and provide the financial means for success. I'd say he's done all that and then some. Articles like this make it sound like sports franchise ownership is a simple science that if u just do "X" and "y" then you'll win. It's mostly trial and error, give the guy a break and realize it could be much much much much worse