I'm thinking andy's 100+ good games before the sens outweighs hammond 10 good games with the sens and 100+ bad games. I'm not disregarding anything..... you are. You're ignoring how he played recently in bingo. I'm looking at all his recent work.
I appreciate what hammonds done.. I wont disregard how hes played poorly very recently before joining the sens. The sens played their best all season before the jets game. The jets game was the only one which i'd say hammond stole.
I never actually said that I cared about their previous games have I?
I was saying that if you were going to put Hammond's bad games as an example, you should put Andy's previous history in as well.
My point, which was clearly highlighted in the last post you quoted, is the fact that it is about RIGHT NOW. We have extremely little margin for error, and RIGHT NOW, Hammond has been getting us the W's.
Back to the AHL work, please tell me why, that it matters. Why. Hammond has done nothing at the NHL level to raise the notion of his AHL work. He is getting it done at the NHL level, that is all that matters RIGHT NOW. It's as if players can't struggle in a lower league, but when given an opportunity to play in the bigger leagues, they can't take it and run. That is basically what you are saying by constantly talking about his AHL record.
Really? Several scoring chances across the west-coast times that Hammond bailed them out for too as good as they were playing. Every team is guilty of giving up prime scoring chances once a game, the Sens were not exception on the entire west-coast trip. Especially in the Wilds game where it was practically and Hammond vs Dubnyk duel.