Tomorrow is a playoff game. I'd rather have my veteran star goalie in between the pipes with all the pressure on. Hammond has been able to walk into a pretty pressure free and loosey goosey environment. The first game back from the road teip against the Sabres, the pressure is now on and he didn't play well with 2 bad goals.
I thank the Hamburglar for his service but now it's time for Andy to run with it if he's healthy.
Against Buffalo, a game where Hammond looked quite shakey, Ottawa buckled down defensively and gave up only 26 shots.
They managed to give up 24 in ONE period against Calgary. And can the nonsense of "they play better in front of Hammond!" For two periods, the Senators were dictating play against the Flames and the scoreboard reflected that. Then, they came into the third period and decided to sit on a lead. They were also poorly coached in that they were defending said lead and Cameron inexplicably cut Ceci and Wiercoch's ice time for more of Boro-Gryba, two d-men who are incapable of moving the puck.
The end result was a shooting gallery on Anderson. Would Hammond have survived that? Not based on his play against Buffalo, but who knows? The important thing is the team survived their worst period of hockey in their last 12 games and still got two points.
Yet, somehow, this is all about Anderson? If the team plays like they did for the first 8 games of this streak and the first 40 of the Flames game, it won't matter who goes in net. Regardless, BOTH goalies have shown they stand on their head and steal games and the veteran #1 has done it over a much larger body of work.
Anyone who thinks Anderson is incapable of starting and winning over a team in a big game just has some ax to grind with him.