Very happy for him, he definitely earned it this past season.
One-way deal, I presume?
That may sound crazy to even ask after his performance, but sophomore slumps, injuries, pairings, etc. all can change things.
The tweet says 2 way deal. Unless it's wrong? I hope it's 2, like you said in case of all of the above listed.
Very happy for him, he definitely earned it this past season.
One-way deal, I presume?
That may sound crazy to even ask after his performance, but sophomore slumps, injuries, pairings, etc. all can change things.
Cap Friendly shows his minors salary also at 1.4M, so it looks like it's a one way. I don't see anywhere in the tweet that says 2-way.
Cap Friendly shows his minors salary also at 1.4M, so it looks like it's a one way. I don't see anywhere in the tweet that says 2-way.
i'm assuming he doesn't have any sort of NTC or NMC. signing him doesn't mean they can't trade him. in fact this deal is reasonable enough that it arguably makes him easier to trade.I'm gonna be the wet blanket...
I (and most others) was of the mindset that one of Krug or Grzelcyk was going to be dealt this offseason. My opinion was that the obvious move was the latter option.
Looks like we're moving Krug now and mark my words... That's gonna hurt.
I don't want to turn it into THAT thread. This one should be about Grzelcyk and how impressive he was during the season (he was excellent) and how he earned the extension (he absolutely did). He's a good kid and I like him a lot.
I would not have have signed him.
Is it a sign that they want to trade him though, or that they want to keep him? To me it's obviously the former.i'm assuming he doesn't have any sort of NTC or NMC. signing him doesn't mean they can't trade him. in fact this deal is reasonable enough that it arguably makes him easier to trade.