Rabid Ranger
2 is better than one
Back to Boeser, but you don't have to be a burner to be a star in this league. Look at Pavelski. If your other attributes/skills are above average/good/great you can make an impact.
He's bungled some trades and made some poor draft picks but he's also made some very smart trades and walked away from the draft table with some absolute steals. If you're expecting perfection from a new GM, you're setting yourself up for disappointment. The Canucks have a top 5 prospect pool in the NHL, which is saying a lot considering they had a bottom 5 prospect pool when Benning inherited the team.
The book has yet to be written on Jim Benning. You'll see.
Top 5 prospect pool? Is that your opinion or do you have a source for that? Lots of teams have good prospects
+Demko being named AHL goaltender of the month, DiPietro having a strong start to his season with the Spitfires, Goldobin tearing up the AHL, Dahlen continuing to impress, and Palmu having a decent start to his pro career.It's easily top 10, lots of our best prospects have had excellent starts. Pettersson is the leading scorer for the best team in the SHL. Gaudette has been tearing up the NCAA. Lind was on a 2PPG pace in the CHL at one point. Even Juolevi seems to be finding his game in Finland.
Things are looking up. We just need a few more pieces.
I wonder why? Maybe other teams have had players graduate early like Tkachuk, Sergachev, Keller. The one good thing he's done is not trade his 1st round pick but then again he's traded more picks than accumulated throughout the years.
2014 Virtanen, McCann
2015 Boeser
2016 Juolevi
2017 Pettersson
Yup definitely a mastermind. High picks/deep drafts batting below 50-50. There's no other GM as worse except Bergevin
Okay, take away the first rounders from the Benning and Gillis era and you still end up with a better prospect pool in 3/4 years of Benning compared to 5 years of Gillis's drafting. The ONLY notable prospect Gillis drafted was Hutton. 5 years of drafting and only Hutton to show for outside of the first round. In comparison, Bennings picks of Demko, Tryamkin (voted top Dman of the month in the KHL), Gaudette (one of the top NCAA scorers), Lind (is around 2 PPG in CHL) look more promising than anything Gillis ever drafted outside of the first round.
Gaudette and Lind have had good starts to this season, and look like future NHLers in some capacity so far, but neither are suddenly future top 6ers. Lockwood and Gadjovic aren't even guaranteed to make the NHL. And DiPietro wouldn't be the first or last goalie to look good in junior and fail to make it. Etc etc.Also, I think you do have to look at what he’s done outside the first round...
Demko (future starter)
Gaudette (future top 6)
Lind (future top 6)
Tryamkin (if he comes back, future top 4 D)
Lockwood (future top 9)
Gadjovic (future top 9, PP net presence)
Dipietro
Undradted Free agent signings..
Stecher
Chatfield
MacEwen