Love
Registered User
- Feb 29, 2012
- 15,046
- 12,321
Such a bad thread idea. I swear people just get bored with their team and come up with these ridiculous ideas.
Theres a greater chance of us drafting someone like Bowen Byram that Kakko or Hughes... in which case it would be especially ridiculous to trade Boeser for a D man.
People on this site have such a silly view of wingers they act like wingers don't matter.. yet you cant convince me that the Blackhawks and their 3 cup winning teams weren't teams that were built very much around wingers. They had a #1D, a #1C, and the best wingers in the league. Not the best defence, not the best goalie, and no where near the best centre depth. C depth was actually pretty terrible for Cup winning teams (Look at their 2Cs) yet they were dominant teams often times carried by their elite wingers like Kane, Sharp, Hossa, Saad, Panarin, Ladd, and Versteeg.
Theres a greater chance of us drafting someone like Bowen Byram that Kakko or Hughes... in which case it would be especially ridiculous to trade Boeser for a D man.
People on this site have such a silly view of wingers they act like wingers don't matter.. yet you cant convince me that the Blackhawks and their 3 cup winning teams weren't teams that were built very much around wingers. They had a #1D, a #1C, and the best wingers in the league. Not the best defence, not the best goalie, and no where near the best centre depth. C depth was actually pretty terrible for Cup winning teams (Look at their 2Cs) yet they were dominant teams often times carried by their elite wingers like Kane, Sharp, Hossa, Saad, Panarin, Ladd, and Versteeg.