Brian Flynn

LaP

Registered User
Jun 27, 2012
24,722
18,123
Quebec City, Canada
This.

The problem is that we have too many 4th line depth guys.

I'm ok with Mitchell, Flynn and Byron on the 4th.

I'm not ok with that 4th line at all. Got to be the smallest and softest 4th line in the whole NHL. I'm ok with Mitchell. He works hard and he is good on the forecheck. I'm sort of ok with Byron. He's fast and a good pker. With a better hockey IQ Byron would actually be a good player. But you got to add a big guy good on the forecheck and able to hit to help them. A guy like prime time Moen.
 

gillyguzzler

Registered User
Jan 21, 2007
2,966
701
Ontario
I'm not ok with that 4th line at all. Got to be the smallest and softest 4th line in the whole NHL. I'm ok with Mitchell. He works hard and he is good on the forecheck. I'm sort of ok with Byron. He's fast and a good pker. With a better hockey IQ Byron would actually be a good player. But you got to add a big guy good on the forecheck and able to hit to help them. A guy like prime time Moen.

Agreed. But lets say Lessio joins Mitchell and Flynn on the 4th. What do they do with Byron? He's a MT favourite but I don't want to see him regularly on the 3rd, much less the 2nd.
 

CGG

Registered User
Jan 6, 2005
4,136
55
416
His best trait is that he can be buried.

Think about it.

He's not a hitter. Not a fast skater. Not a fighter. Not PK specialist. Not a faceoff specialist. Not a savvy veteran.

He's a warm body.

And you wonder why some fans with standards are sick of seeing these broads in our top6?
The guy was 16th on the team in average ice time among forwards. 16th. He played over 15 minutes a grand total of twice in 54 games this past season. He is not nor was he ever a "Top 6" for anything more than an extremely temporary fill-in stop-gap solution. Let's not get carried away here.

Not to mention he was in fact the best on the team in faceoffs, even though you declared he's not a faceoff specialist. He did almost as well on faceoffs as Malhotra the year before, but unlike Malhotra he could actually play a bit once the faceoff was over.

Not a great player. Not even a full time player. A part time 13th forward, nothing more, nothing less. Not a role that you'd give to a rookie or a young player either, and therefore is fine for Flynn. The days of having a trio of Neanderthals on the 4th line wandering around pummeling people are long since over. You need guys who are quick, responsible defensively, can hold on to the puck, create a bit of offense, and hopefully play on the PK on the 4th line. That describes Brian Flynn to a tee. The hate for Flynn, and by extension MB who acquired and signed Flynn, is ridiculous around here.
 

Leon Lucius Black

Registered User
Nov 5, 2007
15,806
5,484
The guy was 16th on the team in average ice time among forwards. 16th. He played over 15 minutes a grand total of twice in 54 games this past season. He is not nor was he ever a "Top 6" for anything more than an extremely temporary fill-in stop-gap solution. Let's not get carried away here.

Not to mention he was in fact the best on the team in faceoffs, even though you declared he's not a faceoff specialist. He did almost as well on faceoffs as Malhotra the year before, but unlike Malhotra he could actually play a bit once the faceoff was over.

Not a great player. Not even a full time player. A part time 13th forward, nothing more, nothing less. Not a role that you'd give to a rookie or a young player either, and therefore is fine for Flynn. The days of having a trio of Neanderthals on the 4th line wandering around pummeling people are long since over. You need guys who are quick, responsible defensively, can hold on to the puck, create a bit of offense, and hopefully play on the PK on the 4th line. That describes Brian Flynn to a tee. The hate for Flynn, and by extension MB who acquired and signed Flynn, is ridiculous around here.

Flynn is a good 13th forward since he can play either wing or centre, is solid defensively and can play the PK.

With Byron outplaying him, and now having Danault around.. we don't have any use for Flynn. He could be good for the AHL since he'll help there offensively and we'll need a veteran to replace Holloway.
 

Rapala

Registered User
Mar 29, 2013
39,459
35,068
Montreal
The guy was 16th on the team in average ice time among forwards. 16th. He played over 15 minutes a grand total of twice in 54 games this past season. He is not nor was he ever a "Top 6" for anything more than an extremely temporary fill-in stop-gap solution. Let's not get carried away here.

Not to mention he was in fact the best on the team in faceoffs, even though you declared he's not a faceoff specialist. He did almost as well on faceoffs as Malhotra the year before, but unlike Malhotra he could actually play a bit once the faceoff was over.

Not a great player. Not even a full time player. A part time 13th forward, nothing more, nothing less. Not a role that you'd give to a rookie or a young player either, and therefore is fine for Flynn. The days of having a trio of Neanderthals on the 4th line wandering around pummeling people are long since over. You need guys who are quick, responsible defensively, can hold on to the puck, create a bit of offense, and hopefully play on the PK on the 4th line. That describes Brian Flynn to a tee. The hate for Flynn, and by extension MB who acquired and signed Flynn, is ridiculous around here.



LOL
Our fourth line is great as long as we are playing three lines.:sarcasm:
Look at the top 8 teams this year and compare...
For all his tinkering and adding of warm bodies I liked our 4th better year one under Bergevin.
 

LaP

Registered User
Jun 27, 2012
24,722
18,123
Quebec City, Canada
LOL
Our fourth line is great as long as we are playing three lines.:sarcasm:
Look at the top 8 teams this year and compare...
For all his tinkering and adding of warm bodies I liked our 4th better year one under Bergevin.

The first 2 years under MB the 4th/13th was basically this on paper.

1st year
Patch-DD-Gallagher
AG-Plekanec-Ryder
Bourque-Eller-Gionta
Moen-Halpern-Prust
White
Armstrong


2nd year
Patch-DD-Gallagher
AG-Plekanec-Vanek
Bourque-Eller-Gionta
Weise-Brière-Prust
White
Moen


When you think about it it's crazy how much worse the team is right now.
 

Fazkovsky

Registered User
Sep 4, 2013
7,248
1,309
That's always the problem in mtl. We have much cheaper alternatives in our farm but we keep adding grinders. Dumont deserved a chance instead of Flynn.

Oh and overpaying defencemen

Two things we keep doing in Montreal.
 

Gyfu

Registered User
May 16, 2011
816
235
That's always the problem in mtl. We have much cheaper alternatives in our farm but we keep adding grinders. Dumont deserved a chance instead of Flynn.

Oh and overpaying defencemen

Two things we keep doing in Montreal.
Damn right about dumont, surprisingly tough for his size too
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad