FadeToBlack
Registered User
- Jul 1, 2012
- 610
- 37
Manning is a decent 7th D, should not be in the lineup.
I disagree, I think he's strictly AHL material on any contending NHL team.
Manning is a decent 7th D, should not be in the lineup.
Medvedev should have been playing instead of Manning, how many more chances are they gonna give Manning?? He sucks!
I disagree, I think he's strictly AHL material on any contending NHL team.
There are still people claiming that he's young, a "rookie," needs time to develop, etc. Dude is older than Luke Schenn, and according to the braintrust fanbase, he's finished and useless.
I'd be fine he was was a 7th D only playing in case of injury.
Manning was a sieve, directly causing three high quality Vancouver scoring chances due to poor reads, physical limitations, or a combination of the two. He was blasted on a controlled zone entry by Bo Horvat, fell down on an odd-man rush later in the second period, and finally whiffed on a keep-in at the blue line which eventually led to a Jake Virtanen goal.
A comedy of errors indeed....sigh
Brandon Manning this year:
45% CF%
20% GF%
35.56% High danger scoring chances %
59.26% Ozone starts.
Brandon Manning this year:
45% CF%
20% GF%
35.56% High danger scoring chances %
59.26% Ozone starts.
Eh, I've seen better and I've seen worse. These type of stats still confuse the heck out of me.
Eh, I've seen better and I've seen worse. These type of stats still confuse the heck out of me.
Though it is a small sample those stats are actually pretty hard to do worse than:
Where those stats would have put him last season amongst NHL Dmen (500+ EV minutes, 206 Dmen played that much)
45% CF = 183/206
20% GF = 206/206
35.56% High % chances = 206/206
59.26% Ozone starts = 20/206
The CF% is tbf probably the best indicator of how he is playing... with the High % chances following after. GF% is pretty tough to draw much from without a sample of say ~30-50+ games... as goals are rare events and can balance out quickly.