Gallagbi
Formerly Eazy_B97
- Jul 5, 2005
- 48,878
- 11,432
verb re·build rē-ˈbild
- to trade Nazem Kadri and Tyler Bozak
well i'll be
I was as surprised as you were
Who cares how good Bozak is?
Rebuild.
Look it up.
verb re·build rē-ˈbild
- to trade Nazem Kadri and Tyler Bozak
well i'll be
Who cares how good Bozak is?
Rebuild.
Look it up.
i just can't see getting anything, at all, for Bozak, not even a 5th or whatever. maybe next year's deadline.
Fair enough. To your point though, why is it imperative to move Bozak and Lupul if we are not contending or being a cap team for a couple seasons and they would likely return more, without retention, at the TDL of the final season of their deals?
It seems impatient to me to use retentions on more than one player with 2+ years left on his deal since there is no immediate urgency to do so(Kessel being one already). Moving Bozak and/or Lupul this season will not make us contenders next season anyway. I would like them moved, but continuing to use our retentions, may leave us out on a bigger deal. If we retain on someone with 2+ years remaining, personally I want it to be because it was necessary to get a big deal done, not just because we want to add another late 2nd.
I still think having all 3 retentions used this season and two used up already for the next 2+ seasons is not the best idea because it is not necessary at this time. That's just me though.
Who cares? Trade both, it's a rebuild, look it up.
Again who cares about value in relation to Kadri, you asked who cares if he plays well.
Bozak plays like **** = who cares?
Kadri has a good game save one mistake = sarcasm and smugness in the other thread.
"Unbiased."
Honestly, because they don't fit in. (and they tick me off . but mostly because I think we could take the roster spots to audition for players who can support the core.
we can buy ourselves a few picks before they fall out of favour (Bozak - in this case talent wise, though he does bring some other aspects to the table - and Lupul - injury + age wise). may hay with the sunshine we've got.
again. using ALL of them (and we can't we only have one right now) isn't ideal, but at the same time, like i've said some people get so - omg we can't use them) as if there's always going to be a perfect time to use them. they are there TO be used. so use them.
...and my response, which you quoted, had no mention of Kadri but you circled back to that.Not sure why you directed that at me. My reply was in response to this that was directed my way:
The problem with Bozak (outside of the 2-3 games where he played well this season) is that he doesn't provide any insulation during a rebuild.
His line is constantly hemmed in which is demoralizing to the team, and his utter lack of effort or hustle on loose pucks is something you don't want observed by younger players.
If he played half-decent, and could semi-manage playing against better players the way Nick Spaling has, for example, then I would be ok with keeping him around during a rebuild.
Ideally we want 2 other centers taking the tougher matchups away from Nylander so that he can ease into the league with less pressure.
Yet, here we are with Spaling matching up against the other teams top line, Kadri against the 2nd line, and Bozak still playing terrible.
As of now, Bozak a negative to have around.
The problem with Bozak (outside of the 2-3 games where he played well this season) is that he doesn't provide any insulation during a rebuild.
His line is constantly hemmed in which is demoralizing to the team, and his utter lack of effort or hustle on loose pucks is something you don't want observed by younger players.
If he played half-decent, and could semi-manage playing against better players the way Nick Spaling has, for example, then I would be ok with keeping him around during a rebuild.
Ideally we want 2 other centers taking the tougher matchups away from Nylander so that he can ease into the league with less pressure.
Yet, here we are with Spaling matching up against the other teams top line, Kadri against the 2nd line, and Bozak still playing terrible.
As of now, Bozak a negative to have around.
I agree. This is basically why I'd consider buying Bozak out after this season, if there is no available trade option. I'd also consider dropping him to the minors. Nylander will likely be up next year.
I don't want Bozak holding back his development. That roster spot needs to be cleared.
I can't see us ever being able to trade Bozak. Every team must have 4 or 5 players in their system just like him already.
He'll never nab a first, but hes certainly got enough value for a second.
Im willing to take wagers that should the Leafs trade him, he brings back at least a second. He'll never nab a first, but hes certainly got enough value for a second.
i just can't see getting anything, at all, for Bozak, not even a 5th or whatever. maybe next year's deadline.
Im willing to take wagers that should the Leafs trade him, he brings back at least a second. He'll never nab a first, but hes certainly got enough value for a second.
You're pure revisionism. Kessel and Kadri were better together than Kessel and Bozak were. The numbers don't lie my friend.
You're wrong.
Another point for Bozak, regardless of where he belongs in the lineup he's still proving he doesn't need Kessel to get points curious to see where he'd be if if he hadn't missed those 4 games.
Another point for Bozak, regardless of where he belongs in the lineup he's still proving he doesn't need Kessel to get points curious to see where he'd be if if he hadn't missed those 4 games.