Blizzard6411
#benchstoner
who is Phillips and Knight?Guys this thread is about the Phillips/Knight trade.
There are other threads for the topics you're all veering into.
who is Phillips and Knight?Guys this thread is about the Phillips/Knight trade.
There are other threads for the topics you're all veering into.
Officially time to call the Burns trade a loss. Understand the reasons at the time..but hard to argue we won that one. Unless Coyle turns into the power forward we all hope he can be..but I have my doubts.
Wild developed young players on the roster
Granlund
Coyle
Zucker
Brodin
Haula
Spurgeon
Scandella
Dumba
Fontaine
Not fully Wild developed, but Wild still had a big impact
Nino
Brodin, Scandella, Spurgeon are solid defensively but offensively; Haula, Granlund, Zucker, and Fontaine? You want to call that a success?
Offensively, Knight is a straightforward player – one I have called on several occasions “the smallest power forward in hockey.” His north-south skating is great and while his lateral agility is middling, he has that top gear that can burst him past even the strongest-skating defensemen. He owns a hard shot with a quick release and can blow it past goaltenders from mid- and even long-range. Modestly creative, he has good passing instincts but seems to look his best when playing within himself: Rushing up the wings, mucking for the puck and driving to the net with fearless, almost reckless abandon.
Knight’s defensive play is admirable as well, and he solidly projects as a great two-way forward: His unwavering discipline and determination aiding in his puck-pursuit and decent positional play. Like many his age, he could benefit from further coaching but it’s easy to see why this is going to be a strength going forward.
Knight projects as a top-six scoring winger who could push for 40 goals in the NHL one day and could be a consistent 30-goal threat from year to year. At his floor, he's a third-liner who will play a solid two-way game. The style comparisons to Ryan Callahan are valid, and the two share some remarkable similarities in terms of size and style, as well as developmental path. Knight also reminds of a young Mark Recchi in that he is not the most explosive skater, but has excellent hands and a knack for generating scoring chances. You don't want to create unrealistic expectations for a player like Knight if he doesn't hit his target ceiling, but at the same time, he was the 32nd overall pick for a reason. The talent, drive and moxie is there and he appears to be just scratching the surface of his potential. He's going to have a tough challenge to win an NHL spot in the fall because of his junior situation, but he is physically ready to make a run. Knight might earn a 10-game audition if he can impress enough at training camp and during the exhibition season.
He could be a poor man's Nino.
not likely.
Pronman didn't even mention Knight in his 2013 Top Ten. http://www.hockeyprospectus.com/puck/article.php?articleid=1586
Boston has been a somewhat weak system for a few years.
Richard Murray had him at 20th last season: http://www.hockeysfuture.com/articl...group-of-boston-bruins-prospects/#more-105109
And he has not been good since. Not every player can make the leap from juniors to pro hockey.
This isn't quite the Oilers trading Tobias Rieder for Kale Kessy, but I think Boston won the trade overall.
Good luck to Zack Phillips.
I sort of doubt they extend Knight, but I guess anything would help Iowa at this point.
Please explain your rationale behind those thoughts. Not that I think you're wrong, just looking for reasoning as Zack Phillips hasn't exactly lit the world on fire either.
If you want to discuss other prospects or the prospect system in general, use the prospect thread. If you want to discuss current wild players, use the general wild thread.
This thread is for discussion of this trade.
Take it to the proper threads.
Can we talk about the trade that brough Philips here?
Just look at AHL point totals. Its not close. Phillips doesn't have much, but Knight is next to nothing. Trade for what could/should be an acceptable AHL player for a fringe AHL player.
When he scored 80 points for St. Johns making me think he was gonna be a good future player. Then he forgot what off season training is.
No, I understand that piece but maybe getting the contract off the books a year early has a large part to do with why they made this trade. Results will remain to be seen.
Results do not remain to be seen. Its obvious so far when those two are compared. And contract? Making peanuts in the AHL? That has to be a joke.
Getting rid of the contract as in freeing up one of the 50 contracted players limited by NHL rules...not the cost of the contract.
But didn't we gain Knight's?