PAYHA
Registered User
Fontaine abstaines from the vote.
Parise is entitled to a vote
Fontaine abstaines from the vote.
Or the organization sucks at developing them. Remember Zidlicky asked for a trade as well. Havlat also asked for a trade. So that's 4.
Those two players have nothing in common with Phillips. Zidlicky and Havlat both didn't like the system after a coaching change.
Phillips was just a marginal player in the AHL with no hope of finding an NHL spot with the depth ahead of him.
Let's not leave the incomparable Torry Mitchell out of this.Those two players have nothing in common with Phillips. Zidlicky and Havlat both didn't like the system after a coaching change.
Phillips was just a marginal player in the AHL with no hope of finding an NHL spot with the depth ahead of him.
Or the organization sucks at developing them. Remember Zidlicky asked for a trade as well. Havlat also asked for a trade. So that's 4.
Or that's what you're thinking. We don't know why Phillips asked to be traded. It could be that certain players passed him up. Or it could be that he didn't think Minnesota had his best interested in mind. Or he didn't think the system or organization was really suited to his development.
well if Phillips was playing above someone else right now, the organization would have sucked at developing that player, right?
So if a prospect can't break through over other prospects at his position, it's the organization's fault he didn't develop enough...
nice trap.
Zid and Havlat were around when we sucked, and IIRC it was reported of both of them they were issuing usage demands of the coaching staff prior to anything coming out about trade demands. I think the feeling was mutual.
Or it could be that you're just reaching for something to criticize the Wild about since they're winning and left you only straws to grasp at to knock Fletcher with.
It's still a reflection of this organization. I think that both can be at fault for someone. I don't necessarily think moving Havlat and Zidlicky was bad but at the same time, you have - actually now 5 guys asking for trades. That isn't really healthy for an organization. It's not a bad sign either but it's a trend that may need to be looked at.
Only you could say the Wild don't develop talent well, whilst the roster is made up of mostly young developed talent and are in playoff position.
1. List the players that wanted out
2. List the players that wanted to come here
3. Decide which list you would rather have
Only you could say the Wild don't develop talent well, whilst the roster is made up of mostly young developed talent and are in playoff position.
1. List the players that wanted out
2. List the players that wanted to come here
3. Decide which list you would rather have
he has placed his focus on Iowa now.
Trend? Really?
Yes, because if we took away Parise, Suter, and Vanek - this team would still be in the position they are in today. Let's forget those signings. Also, if you take away Coyle (from the Burns trade), el Nino (Clutterbuck) and Koivu, this team would be really super as they were the results of development from before this current management group came in.
Brodin, Scandella, Spurgeon are solid defensively but offensively; Haula, Granlund, Zucker, and Fontaine? You want to call that a success?
Yes, because if we took away Parise, Suter, and Vanek - this team would still be in the position they are in today. Let's forget those signings. Also, if you take away Coyle (from the Burns trade), el Nino (Clutterbuck) and Koivu, this team would be really super as they were the results of development from before this current management group came in.
Brodin, Scandella, Spurgeon are solid defensively but offensively; Haula, Granlund, Zucker, and Fontaine? You want to call that a success?
Guys if you take away the good things your franchise has done it wouldn't be good. More at 11.