SixthSens
RIP Fugu
- Dec 5, 2007
- 11,969
- 644
MacLean's usage of Ryan only makes sense if Ryan has been playing injured, which is the rumor. I am very frustrated with Ryan's lack of minutes, especially in key games, but I am reserving some of my judgment until after the season is over. At that point the team usually comes clean about which players were playing through injuries.
I hope it's a nagging injury...but then again, if it is, why is he angry about icetime?
He said in the radio that he's been playing thru an injury that he'd normally have surgery on but it's too important to sit out and as long as he can play, he'll play.
He said in the radio that he's been playing thru an injury that he'd normally have surgery on but it's too important to sit out and as long as he can play, he'll play.
He said in the radio that he's been playing thru an injury that he'd normally have surgery on but it's too important to sit out and as long as he can play, he'll play.
On Ottawa radio? When?
I like that Ryan is playing hurt in some ways but if we don't get some points in the next few games he should probably sit and get ready for next year.
I hope it's a nagging injury...but then again, if it is, why is he angry about icetime?
After the Olympics Ryan didn't come back and practice with the team right away and it was said he had a nagging injury that they were trying to clear up, even if they weren't able to make it 100 percent.
When he first started back he said it(the mystery injury) felt a lot better but you have to wonder now if it has started to bother him again.
I hope this team re-signs Ryan... Stability in players is nice... Hate the revolving door of players management has been running through... Need stability
So you're comfortable offering him an 8 year extension at $7M per this summer? I don't think the Sens want to go in to next season with him potentially becoming a UFA at seasons end. He's going to command top dollar/term. Can his legs keep up? Will he reeeeeaaallly hit a wall in three years time? Lots of things to consider for an organization that's all about cost per point.
If the Sens are not comfortable with that then why give up Silf, Noesen and a 1st for a guy who is a UFA in two years?
Blows my mind... If your not going to keep Ryan then don't make the move... Silf could have been a great stability piece for this franchise.
Instead we rent Ryan for a year or two and then move him cause we can't re-sign him and begin the process of incorporating new players into the system again... And the treadmill continues