Alfieghetti
inflamed
- Jul 29, 2009
- 842
- 0
I think it's a safe bet that all 4 of these guys end up better than Tavares, the worst #1 since Fleury.
How do this year's Big 4 (Larsson, RNH, Landeskog, Couturier) stack up against that of previous years (2008, 2009, 2010)?
I think it's a safe bet that all 4 of these guys end up better than Tavares, the worst #1 since Fleury.
I think it's a safe bet that all 4 of these guys end up better than Tavares, the worst #1 since Fleury.
Musil has fallen a fair bit from where he used to be, but I don't think there's any chance he could fall to the late 2nd round. 6'3" shutdown guy with some offensive upside, apparently makes good breakout passes and is decently physical, can't see him falling any further than late 1st/early 2nd.Musil, Janskin and Jurco will be great picks if they go in the late 2nd round i hope the wings pick up Musil seems like a nice player to have in the system for when Rafalski goes.
I have a feeling his WJC performance lowered him down the rankings a bit.
Correct me if im wrong.
08:
Stamkos
Doughty
Bogosian
Pietrangelo
09:
Tavares
Hedman
Duchene
Kane
10:
Hall
Seguin
Gudbranson
Johanson
Larsson and RNH have the highest ceilings with RNH's ceiling being similar to Duchene's and Larsson's ceiling being similar to Hedman's. Personally I would say the depth in the top 4 is great where any team would like any player.
Does anyone else find the top 5 of this draft eerily similar to the 2006 draft? I think they're all going to be really good players, but perhaps not the kind of players you can build a franchise around like a Crosby or Ovechkin.
Musil has fallen a fair bit from where he used to be, but I don't think there's any chance he could fall to the late 2nd round. 6'3" shutdown guy with some offensive upside, apparently makes good breakout passes and is decently physical, can't see him falling any further than late 1st/early 2nd.
I think it's a safe bet that all 4 of these guys end up better than Tavares, the worst #1 since Fleury.