All of them were also better teams than current Ducks.
I guess BM doesn't have to do anything to improve the team. Stats say Ducks gonna be 2016 champs.
Ducks don't have to be better than previous champions, they have to better than their immediate competition.
and Ducks were at a unique position that even staying put they had a good chance of becoming that much better just by virtue of young guys being one year older. Right after they were almost good enough to beat an elite team.
What BM did was at least lateral movements. Then intangibles like new scenery, finally playing for a competitor, etc come into play.
we will not know how much better (or worse) this team is until we see at least a dozen of games.
This team (few moves ago) was almost as good as current champion (one of the best if not the best team of the past decade), at times it looked better. So your "current team is worse" is at least speculation, at most bitter opinion.
It has as much (and as little) merit as my "trend" of the WCF loser's next year success that was put out there half jokingly.
But I guess for some things like that have to be spelled out... here it is...
It is a neat trend that is fun to look at and makes for a nice trivia question. It also gives some hope and food for thought in the absence of actual ice action while all anyone can do is speculate and ask "is it October yet" every 5 minutes.
here. is it better?