Derivation
Registered User
- Jan 4, 2010
- 2,050
- 1
Andy complimenting Neil and ripping team for not playing together. Andy would like to see less oddman rushes lol
How many points even strength do Turris, Mac and Chiasson have since being put together? I'm going to assume not more than 2 each. I don't understand how they were still together for this game.
Dear God. Ryan has been playing well, on a bit of a point streak prior to this, called out for tremendous defensive play on a bunch of occasions and now he's a scrub?
Good for Andy. Needed to be said from him tonight.
Signing Michalek was a mistake, and I'd really like a do-over on the Ryan trade. We're a budget team, and that cash could have been spread across a few players, letting us push a our non-NHLers off our depth chart.
I agree, that line has been atrocious. Stone, Ryan or bust.
Stop using Chiasson there, he isn't first line material.
Karlsson will never win the Norris again. Yeah I said it....
Way too many minutes for him and he was soft all over the ice. Then again so were most of D men.
You need dmen that can move the puck and defend the entry into the zone. We aint winning **** with this D corp.
Gryba - slow
Phillips - slow
Cowen - slow cant pivot
Wiercioch - slow, soft and hard time pivoting
Karlsson - Kaptain Turnover
Ceci - Best overall D man we have and he's 21!
Borowiecki- heart and grit, but slow
Methot - our only hope?
I don't think anyone is saying bring back spezza
What ppl are saying is that we need a number 1 center this reminds me of the days where we had white as our top center
This is still the youngest team in the league right? Did that change all of a sudden?
this is a young team coming off a major win. I expected a let down. nothing to worry about, carry on. i have no worries at all about the progress of this team. sorry guys.
I would appreciate your optimism if it didn't strike me mostly as denial.
This team is mediocre, and I can't fool myself otherwise. We're going to win some but lose more, and the playoffs seem like an unattainable goal to me. Inconsistency might seem like progress to you, but to me it feels more like idling, and big changes will need to be made to take further steps in the right direction.
I don't think it's an either/or proposition: we certainly lack talent due to budget, but we could also do better with what we got.Yup.
Although some people want to believe spending does not matter, and you are the 30th out of 30 in spending you end up having a 5/6 D in your top pairing, maybe 3 top 6 forwards, etc. Players with marginal talent are forced to play above their level and as a result they end up failing. People read this as a system problem when it is a depth of skill problem.
I shudder to think where we would be without Andy and Lehner's stellar play this season.
So then we get a shot at McDavid and our young guys get a year of development. Big whoop.
Plus for all you guys who seem to hate veterans, you're one year closer to having whipping boys, Phillips, Neil and Legwand off the team. Win-win, no?
That's just the thing, mediocrity doesn't get us McDavid. I think we'll finish between 10-12th in the east and draft outside the top five, which is still good, but won't get us that generational talent other teams that are really crappy get when tanking.
And also, yes, the kids get a year of development, but our kids aren't exactly stars either. We'll eventually need to bring in top-6 talent from the outside.
And a year from now Michalek will still have two years remaining on his contract. Not a win.
I don't think it's an either/or proposition: we certainly lack talent due to budget, but we could also do better with what we got.