We didn't trade it away, but I think most of us rather have a Top 5 pick then 2 late picks, we could bundle them up and trade up to the mid first round but I'm not sure.Scintillating said:But hey, you also get 32nd! assuming Florida still has their 2nd round pick...
You can definitly get a good core of players with that though.RangerBoy said:The Rangers were the biggest draft lottery losers.It's not even close
The Rangers have four of the first 45 picks
saillias said:Calgary's 2nd round pick belongs to San Jose so we lose the benefits of switching the order around in the next round...
burner10115 said:winner- F'ing pittsburgh. Good luck to them and Crosby (and malkin, and fleury, and mario,) I'm just happy NJ, Isles, TOR, or Phill didn't win.
losers- NYR. (It sux to be ranger fan rite now. I was hoping for top ten but I honestly thought we would end up rite where we did.) Buffalo got it bad too.
I doubt the pens would ever have any interest in the Albanian asassin... At least I hope so.Rakiet said:Don't forget about Rechi, damn they actually are shaping up fairly well.
Also Tie Domi may come over to Pittsburg because he has a very strong relationship with Lemieux and because the situation has changed of course
Harper said:Compensation picks are for teams that lost Group III UFAs between July 1, 2004 and September 15, 2004...
Boston gets a couple,
What he saidice berg slim said:Florida easily biggest losers, Biggest winner I would say Montreal
and thats why they were in the lottory of the 2004 draft.Gwyddbwyll said:Overall I was pretty happy with the draft order.. turned out much fairer than I hoped for - with all the big money teams in the bottom half.
Biggest winners:
1 Montreal
2 Vancouver
3 Anaheim
4 San Jose
5 Minnesota
6 Ottawa
Biggest losers:
1 Florida
2 Edmonton
3 Phoenix
4 New York
These are the 4 teams that failed to make the playoffs last season yet pick in the bottom half of the draw.