Are there any significant unrestricted free agents who were close to signing with a team other than the one they ultimately chose?
Aldready mentioned in the first post, but got to be talked about in a thread like this: The Great One was in the summer of 1996 almost a Canuck, a Leaf and almost stayed with the Blues if I remember correct.
The Canucks where frontlines as the story goes. The story continues with that the owners were breathing down the GM of the Canucks (Quinn at the time?) and at one time Quinn was forced to call Gretzky in the middle in the night. After that Gretzky lost interest. Never know if this have been confirmed or not. Gretzky is too much of a gentleman to ever say such a thing right out.
At the same time Gretzky has given Fletcher credit for almost luring him to Toronto that summer. Actually I´m quite surprised that he didn´t go there. Ontario boy and all. His favourite team growing up, even if Howe was his idol if I remember correctley.
And he has said his first intent when landing with the Blues was to stay there. Tought that would be his last stop and he would retire a Blues. Janet is from St.Louis, so they had family ties as well. But what´s been told is that Gretzky got fed up with Keenans way off leading the team in that short time. Rumour off a falling out in the locker room during the play offs have been circulating. Some say Hull took Gretzkys side. Would have been nice to see what kind of chemistry they would have had if given a season or two...
Back to trades, still with The Great One and also mentioned in the first post. And this one would have more affect than even the Lindros trade:
Despite what many think, Janet wanted Wayne to choose Detroit in 1988. It was Gretzkys father who convinced him off LA. New York was the third alternative Sather presented to Gretzky. I think Sather is overrated overall, even if he has surprised me with his building off the good Rangers team off the last years. But I love him for the way he handled the Gretzky trade. At first refusual. Then making the best off the crappy situation. For both the Oilers and Gretzky. And giving Gretzky the last word of destination.
THAT no-trade to LA would have changed the landscape like none other trade. No California-hockey boom. No Anaheim, San José for starters... and that´s just the tip off the iceberg. The interest in hockey nationwide in the USA must have sky rocketed after that trade.
Maybe the Jets signing of Bobby Hull is the only one who historically could be argued as big as that. NHL landscape wise.
Brett Hull was all but signed by the Habs, and then Detroit came in with a late offer (for less cash) and he couldn't resist the chance for another cup or two.
Didn´t remember this! Nice little trivia to have. Extra nice when somebody chooses winning over money. Good to have in arguments
Shanahan to the Blues for Brind'amour & CuJo ... instead the Devils were awarded Scott Stevens.
The Lindros trade and all its possibilities and the Shanny offer sheet changed the course of the NHL more than any othwr deals of the last 25 years.
Agree with this. If we take the cutoff at 27 years, the possible outcomes off the Gretzky-trade trumphs both. But the Stevens/Shanny-situation sure is material for some good late nights "what if´s". For a small appetizer: would Stevens ever become the player he became if not for the last touch by Lemaire/Robinson. Much like Bowman/Yzerman. Both great, great players before and when looking at All Star Teams and such both seem to have peaked before. But I would probably choose both Yzerman and Stevens after 94/95 instead off there high scoring days. Will be interesting if Ovechkin will be seen as Yzerman when his career is over. He is arguably a more complete player this season than ever before. Even if more exciting and blazing in the 05-10 version. Much like Yzerman and Stevens late 80 compared to mid 90 in my mind. Ovechkin still "has" one year on Stevens and two years on Yzermans to go before before their first SC.