Better team outside of the big two: Leafs vs. Oilers

Better team outside of the big two: Leafs vs. Oilers


  • Total voters
    182

Sidney the Kidney

One last time
Jun 29, 2009
55,750
46,768
That’s why I don’t buy that Ekholm > Rielly because of these stats. I’ve seen both at their best and give me Rielly every time, he will bring close to the same defense with a noticeable gap offensively.
Rielly's never been close to Ekholm defensively. His edge is in puck carrying and offense, but it's not even close defensively.
 

McVespa99

Registered User
May 13, 2007
5,948
2,707
Yet in the playoffs he plays very good nearly every single time, contrary to what some may think despite the Leafs lack of success. Like I said based on what I’ve seen from both at their best give me Rielly, I’m not convinced Ekholm would have the same two-way impact.
You can say this as many times as you want and in as many different ways as you want. That doesn't make it true... Rielly is not close to Ekholm on defense. Now if you want to argue he is better on offense then you may have a case although even that is questionable.
Rielly has 46 points and is minus 2 with first powerplay time.
Ekholm has 28 points with basically no powerplay time and is plus 30. If he was on the powerplay he would probably have the same or more points than Rielly. With Bouchard on the team no other dman will get much PP time.
Yah any non biased fan is taking Ekholm.
 

abo9

Registered User
Jun 25, 2017
9,091
7,184
I like the Oilers depth better.
Although Nylander is probably closer to Matthews and Marner than anyone on the Oilers are to McDavid/Draisaitl.

But Oilers have come a long way since McDavid's rookie year... flashes of Sekera and Benoit Pouliot lol
 

Tkachuk4MVP

32 Years of Fail
Apr 15, 2006
14,800
2,684
San Diego, CA
Nylander's the best of the remaining bunch, but I kind of prefer players like Kane and Hyman because of the style they bring for the playoffs.

Leafs depth probably has more "skill", but the Oilers have a better blend of skill/physicality/grit.

Fair point, but Nylander’s a bad example because he’s been one of the few bright spots for the Leafs in the playoffs the last couple seasons.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sundinisagod

FlameChampion

Registered User
Jul 13, 2011
13,665
15,307
I think it’s the Oilers. They have shown more ability to win in the postseason.

That being said, I don’t think either is team is going to win. It’s highly improbable that any Canadian team wins at this point.

Theres too much going against these teams.
 

GreeningOil

Yarpmeister
Jun 22, 2016
2,965
3,495
Saskatoon
Hyman can drive a line better than Tavares this season. Nylander is easily the best player outside of them all and Rielly is probably better than any defenseman on Edmonton at his best. Overall their supporting casts are really quite close.
Reilly is straight up not better than Ekholm and maybe not Bouchard.
Rielly is so overrated.

Mattias Ekholm 5v5 since joining the Oilers:
61GF, 39GA (61 GF%)
61.51xGF%
21 points
Without McDavid or Draisaitl on the ice: 55 GF%, 53.19 xGF%

Morgan Rielly 5v5 in the same span:
59GF, 56GA (51.30 GF%)
48.39xGF%
22 points
Without Matthews or Marner on the ice: 43.93 GF%, 47.64 xGF%
haters don’t like when you show them valid evidence
 

klefbombs shoulder

Registered User
Jul 21, 2023
535
971
Reilly is straight up not better than Ekholm and maybe not Bouchard.

haters don’t like when you show them valid evidence
Bouchard is also far better than Rielly now too. Rielly is more on Nurse's level. Hes basically a less defensively sound Nurse with better finishing that get PP time.
 

authentic

Registered User
Jan 28, 2015
25,903
10,962
Reilly is straight up not better than Ekholm and maybe not Bouchard.

haters don’t like when you show them valid evidence

A 60-70 point defenseman is straight up not better than a 30-40 point one? I don’t know about that. Rielly isn’t nearly as bad defensively as people seem to think. He certainly can be but when he’s at his best he is capable of playing great defense while still producing offensively. Even if Ekholm was better overall it’s hard to imagine the difference is so clearcut as is being portrayed in this thread


Look at their playoff stats for instance, Rielly has 37 points in 50 games +12, Ekholm has 42 points in 87 games +12, and Ekholm is clearly better?
 
Last edited:

McNuge

Registered User
Dec 17, 2010
1,853
1,618
Cambridge Ontario
A 60-70 point defenseman is straight up not better than a 30-40 point one? I don’t know about that. Rielly isn’t nearly as bad defensively as people seem to think. He certainly can be but when he’s at his best he is capable of playing great defense while still producing offensively. Even if Ekholm was better overall it’s hard to imagine the difference is so clearcut as is being portrayed in this thread


Look at their playoff stats for instance, Rielly has 37 points in 50 games +12, Ekholm has 42 points in 87 games +12, and Ekholm is clearly better?
One of those players is on the #1PP while the other has not been. Bouchard and Josi are 2 elite OFD in the league. Hard to knock either one off the PP. Ek is an absolute beauty though, guys going to retire an Oiler.
 

Oleksiak

Registered User
Jun 12, 2019
2,153
3,089
Victoria, BC
A 60-70 point defenseman is straight up not better than a 30-40 point one? I don’t know about that. Rielly isn’t nearly as bad defensively as people seem to think. He certainly can be but when he’s at his best he is capable of playing great defense while still producing offensively. Even if Ekholm was better overall it’s hard to imagine the difference is so clearcut as is being portrayed in this thread


Look at their playoff stats for instance, Rielly has 37 points in 50 games +12, Ekholm has 42 points in 87 games +12, and Ekholm is clearly better?
Yes. You're really underestimating just how much of a liability Rielly is in his own zone. Toronto improved while he was suspected due to not having to try to cover for that pylon. Ekholm plays like an NHLer in every zone.
 

authentic

Registered User
Jan 28, 2015
25,903
10,962
One of those players is on the #1PP while the other has not been. Bouchard and Josi are 2 elite OFD in the league. Hard to knock either one off the PP. Ek is an absolute beauty though, guys going to retire an Oiler.

He’s a very good defenseman for sure and pretty consistently better than Rielly defensively, I just really do not see him as a better player overall.
 

GreeningOil

Yarpmeister
Jun 22, 2016
2,965
3,495
Saskatoon
A 60-70 point defenseman is straight up not better than a 30-40 point one? I don’t know about that. Rielly isn’t nearly as bad defensively as people seem to think. He certainly can be but when he’s at his best he is capable of playing great defense while still producing offensively. Even if Ekholm was better overall it’s hard to imagine the difference is so clearcut as is being portrayed in this thread


Look at their playoff stats for instance, Rielly has 37 points in 50 games +12, Ekholm has 42 points in 87 games +12, and Ekholm is clearly better?
Statistically Ekholm is indeed better
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0711.jpeg
    IMG_0711.jpeg
    117.8 KB · Views: 4
  • IMG_0710.jpeg
    IMG_0710.jpeg
    120.4 KB · Views: 4

wetcoast

Registered User
Nov 20, 2018
22,583
10,364
Pretty comfortably Edmonton. Nylander is the best overall player but Edmonton has a wider pool of talent.

Looking at the teams outside of the big 2:

Toronto:

Bertuzzi - ______ - ______
Domi - Tavares - Nylander
Knies - Kampf - Jarnkrok
Homberg - Dewar - Reaves

Brodie - McCabe
Rielly - Lyubushkin
Edmudsun - Liljegren

Edmonton:

RNH - ______ - Hyman
McLeod - ______ - Foegele
Kane - Henrique - Perry
Janmark - Carrick - Brown

Ekholm - Bouchard
Nurse - Ceci
Desharnais - Kulak
Pretty much this and as much as people pile on about the Oilers back end they are simply much better as a group than the Leafs.
 

McVespa99

Registered User
May 13, 2007
5,948
2,707
He’s a very good defenseman for sure and pretty consistently better than Rielly defensively, I just really do not see him as a better player overall.
Then there is just no hope for you:) Might as well become a cricket fan
 

Buck Naked

Can't-Stand-Ya
Aug 18, 2016
3,749
5,652
One of those players is on the #1PP while the other has not been.

Don't forget that he was so good on the PP1 last year that Toronto signed John Klingberg to take over that spot. That's how good Rielly is.
 

The Nuge

Some say…
Jan 26, 2011
27,421
7,482
British Columbia
Who was the best Oilers defenseman in 2015?

Sekera was a good hockey player, but not #1 material, at least in 2015

Klefbom. He was proving to be a legit #1 that year (although he really broke out the next year). He got voted about the 20th best dman in the league on HF back then. By 2016 when Larsson arrived, Sekera was down on the 2nd pairing with Kris Russell. At his peak he was a borderline #2, or very good #3.

It sucks because we actually nearly had a legitimate powerhouse defense and then we lost Sekera to injury at 31 years old, right as Klefbom was really establishing himself, and then we lost Klefbom to injury at 26 years old, right as Nurse was establishing himself.

Regardless, I’m pretty sure OP’s point was just that it’s not fair to lump him in with Pouliot because he was a good dman, who any team in the league would have happily put in their top 4.
 

authentic

Registered User
Jan 28, 2015
25,903
10,962
Don't forget that he was so good on the PP1 last year that Toronto signed John Klingberg to take over that spot. That's how good Rielly is.

His stats on the powerplay are as good as Klingberg’s were in his prime
 

Tobias Kahun

Registered User
Oct 3, 2017
42,456
51,717
A 60-70 point defenseman is straight up not better than a 30-40 point one? I don’t know about that. Rielly isn’t nearly as bad defensively as people seem to think. He certainly can be but when he’s at his best he is capable of playing great defense while still producing offensively. Even if Ekholm was better overall it’s hard to imagine the difference is so clearcut as is being portrayed in this thread


Look at their playoff stats for instance, Rielly has 37 points in 50 games +12, Ekholm has 42 points in 87 games +12, and Ekholm is clearly better?
Okay then.

Bouchard > Rielly then.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad