HuimaHuima
Registered User
- Jul 21, 2011
- 60
- 34
Rantanen is the best. Not sure about the other two. Maybe Aho ahead of Barkov?
I don't like him. Despite his powerplay goals.How?! Barkov is an over PPG, Selke calibre center with third liners on his wings. He's absolutely the best of the three.
Pay no attention to him on this subject.How?! Barkov is an over PPG, Selke calibre center with third liners on his wings. He's absolutely the best of the three.
If you could vote all 3 4th you would. Run along. All 5 of those PPG really inflate his stats lmao.I don't like him. Despite his powerplay goals.
Let's not act like Carolina isn't a good team.Barkov is the best, two-way superstar and franchise center.
Aho vs Rantanen is tricky, center vs winger with better offensive production under more favorable circumstances (Colorado team).
Rantanen is the best. Not sure about the other two. Maybe Aho ahead of Barkov?
I don't like him. Despite his powerplay goals.
Hopefully one day we can get Aho out of that talent wasteland that is Carolina.Barkov is the best, two-way superstar and franchise center.
Aho vs Rantanen is tricky, center vs winger with better offensive production under more favorable circumstances (Colorado team).
Let's not act like Carolina isn't a good team.
Don't overreact, playing alongside MacKinnon is quite helpful in generating points and this is what I was referring to.Hopefully one day we can get Aho out of that talent wasteland that is Carolina.
Rantanen is not better than Aho and Barkov; one is only listed here because he plays with the 2nd best player in the NHLRantanen is the best. Not sure about the other two. Maybe Aho ahead of Barkov?
Barkov, I agree. With Aho, that's debatable.Rantanen is not better than Aho and Barkov; one is only listed here because he plays with the 2nd best player in the NHL
Aho is a center and I imagine hed do very well point wise next to a top-5 NHL playerBarkov, I agree. With Aho, that's debatable.
Barkov
Rantanen
Aho
pretty easy actually