I would also point out the Bears were one's who leaked originally the helmet rule being impasse and then watched fans/media turn on them for stance
Now here we are with this leak to portray the Bears as somehow the victim despite Bears being original leak for original reason for contract impasse
If I am Smith and his agents I go on offensive and withdraw from negotiating table and hold press conference in which I condemn the Bears for releasing false information to media and then go on offensive against Bears management/ownership and its poor history
I would point out the low reputation among players around league and fans with regard to the McCaskey ownership group and ask openly if such people are qualified to run a sports franchise. I would point out the continued employment of Ted Phillips , etc , etc
If Bears want to dirty up the field then I am sure Smith and his agent can do just that. We saw Charges pull this **** with Bosa and try to turn fanbase against him and his family/agents
I cant believe in 2018 that fans still give McCaskey/Phillips/Bears any benefit of the doubt
I don't know when the Bears relented on the helmet to helmet issue, but I believe they are being truthful about off the field issues impacting guarantees as the sticking point.
CAA is using Roquan Smith and the Bears as the guinea pig vs. NFL. The NFLPA is so weak, the player's agents end up creating precedents. Roquan Smith is an Economics major. He's a smart kid. He might be doing this for the rookies who come after.
I believe CAA and Roquan's demand is a bit unreasonable, but I kind of understand what they are trying to do. NFL guarantees are the weakest of the 5 major team sports. They are doing the job of the NFLPA.
I hope this ends soon. No one's 100% villain in most negotiations. There's usually rational arguments from both sides. In this situation, I side with the Bears ... but I understand Roquan's's stance.