if we got the same return we got when we were last "Lindros'd" I'd be fine with that
Don't think anyone will ever get that kind of return again. Maybe if Pittsburgh was forced to trade Crosby or Malkin.
if we got the same return we got when we were last "Lindros'd" I'd be fine with that
SOB still has two.
I know that I'm in the minority, but I don't mind O'Brien on the team, as long as he's in the #5 or 6 role, he does that quite well, provides some toughness and seems like a good locker room guy.
The problem, which is the same as it is with Hunwick/Zanon/O'Byrne, is that they are put into a position which guarantees failure, which is they're relied on too much, then they get exposed.
...... There really aren't logical answers to these questions.
Someone should tell Sacco his only PMD has five points in thirty games playing twenty minutes a night.
SOB still has two.
Anyone else think O'Brien is a given to be traded at the deadline? When Quincey was traded last season I was shocked O'Brien wasn't because they were good buddies, I can see Sacco benching O'Brien because he wants him gone and wants to show management that they don't need him
Anyone else think O'Brien is a given to be traded at the deadline? When Quincey was traded last season I was shocked O'Brien wasn't because they were good buddies, I can see Sacco benching O'Brien because he wants him gone and wants to show management that they don't need him
Think it is the opposite. He is not being "showcased" at all. Of the big 4 (Zanon, O'Byrne, Hunwick, and O'Brien) I think SOB is the least likely to be moved unless he is the only one teams come asking for.