The first goal absolutely needs to be saved. George needs to be aggressive towards the puck then it never gets deflected through his legs. He sat back and gave Kaprizov the chance to deflect it.
Goal 2 was telegraphed George failed to make the push. Not awful but very much so saveable.
George sucks another barely 90 save percentage night, on a light workload. Most goalies would kill to only face 21 shots.
Goalies aren't taught to bulldoze through the players in front of them to make a save. Once you're set that's your best bet in dealing with any situation. He dealt with it in every way a goalie coach would tell him to. Deflected goals are hard to stop and the reality is they happen so fast the best bet to saving them is a combination of positioning, size, and luck. The closer the deflection is the more you're hoping for a lucky save.
Zuccarello had three players to pass the puck to plus the option to walk out of the corner unimpeded because there were only three Avs in the defensive zone. At some point you have to trust your defense to make the right play or you're going to cheat and get burned. No kidding he was telegraphing a pass but Georgiev wouldn't know until the pass was made due to all the scoring threats where it was going. Stop the pass, that's the defenders job.
For the record NST had Georgiev see a xGA of 3.49 and MoneyPuck had him with a xGA of 3.35 so each model had him over a 1 GSAx. That's giving his team an 83% chance at winning, kind of good. If you're married to SV% allowing 2 goals on 21 shots is classified as a Quality Start and provides a ~73% chance at winning. The NHL is in a place now where no matter what it's extremely unlikely a team is not going to score at least two goals. It's not like those 21 shots were muffins either. Like I just pointed out Georgiev saw a xGA of ~3.5 and on 21 shots that implies there were some dangerous chances there. For those of us that watched it was pretty obvious Georgiev saved the team fairly often.
