Pavelski doesn't play a shut down third line role.
Can we at least acknowledge that it MIGHT become a problem? And as of now, it's a bit of a pipe dream to have Stastny in a 3rd line role (5on5) long term?
It's definitely not a no-brainer to re-sign Stastny long-term. My point was simply that IMO, the notion of a guy being a "third line center" doesn't mean you absolutely have to get a guy who's notably cheaper than the two guys above him on the depth chart.
And there are a lot of ways to build a winner. You don't necessarily need the third line center to play a shutdown role. Pavelski doesn't play a shutdown role, but he's the SJ's third line guy (at least when Hertl is healthy) and enjoys slightly softer minutes, which of course he uses to ram the puck down the Avs' throat whenever he's in town.
I don't know. Just because you play him in a defensive role doesn't mean he has to stand in his own zone all the time. If you can score, you can score and it's good you're able to score. We can still use him on the power play. The fact that he's proved to be a complete player is only a good thing that we can use to our advantage.
I think it would be great that the older he gets the less his priority is in scoring. We already have ROR-Dutch and Landy-Mack lines to take care of that.
I'm just saying if you want to utilize Stastny, put guys with him who can score. I'd rather not see him get saddled with a couple defensive grinders. Stastny would still likely get points, but nowhere near where you'd want a guy with his skills to get.
I think the Rangers proved you can roll out three lines that can score and excel. If anything, their third line of Pouliot-Brassard-Zuccarello is their weakest defensively, but was giving the Avs fits all night with their speed.