How many more until deadline day? 5?
Lebrun (through that Nichols guy) mentioned that he asked two GM's about Bergevin's comments regarding Sergachev and got two answers. 1 gm said of course you trade for the proven guy, you have no idea what the prospect becomes. 2nd gm said no, if you have the heir apparent to Markov you never give that up.
Bergevin has to know if they get ousted in round 1 or 2 of the playoffs he's gone. They keep slipping Duchene will be in Montreal in no time.
Lebrun (through that Nichols guy) mentioned that he asked two GM's about Bergevin's comments regarding Sergachev and got two answers. 1 gm said of course you trade for the proven guy, you have no idea what the prospect becomes. 2nd gm said no, if you have the heir apparent to Markov you never give that up.
Bergevin has to know if they get ousted in round 1 or 2 of the playoffs he's gone. They keep slipping Duchene will be in Montreal in no time.
“It’s an interesting thing,” said hockey Insider Pierre LeBrun during a Wednesday evening radio appearance on Montreal’s TSN 690. “I just happened to be talking to two other GMs in the league yesterday and we ended up talking about the Habs because they were the story of the day. And I got a completely different answer from either one.
“One of them said, ‘To heck with the future, your job’s on the line. Go get Duchene and whoever else and try to win now, even if it costs you your best prospect. How do you know for sure your prospect is going to be a great player? I mean, does anyone really know?’
“But the other GM said, ‘No. You drafted this guy and your staff believes he’s Andrei Markov’s heir apparent. That’s worth more than almost anything on the market.’
“So two completely different answers from two guys who also run teams. So I guess it speaks to the difficulty of the position that Bergevin is in right now
I saw this proposal on the main board and wanted to get other Avs fans thoughts.
To MTL:
Duchene
Landeskog
To COL:
Galchenyuk
Sergachev
Plekanec (For cap reasons)
Lekhonen
2nd Round Pick (2018 Washington)
IMO it's not too bad, not that I'm advocating trading both Duchy & Landy in the same deal, but it's pretty good value. Again... it's not my post and I don't LOVE it... thoughts?
Honestly it's crap. The only pieces worth a damn are Sergachev and Galchenyuk. Outside that you get a cap dump, an OK prospect and a 2nd that might as well be a 3rd. If we are trading both Landy and Duchene in the same deal it better be mind blowing and this deal isn't that.
Montreal would have to add at least another solid piece Beaulieu or Juulsen and add a 1st to get me thinking about it.
http://www.fanragsports.com/nhl/lebrun-examines-trade-perspective-canadiens-bergevin/
I wonder who that GM is . I love the enthusiasm. It's definitely some GM who doesn't have a Sergachev type in his pipeline but would absolutely love to add a Matt Duchene to his team. Sounds very "Jim Rutherford".
Thanks for the honest response. I can't say I disagree. Funny that MTL fans who replied absolutely hated it, thought the Habs were giving up too much.
If you are in the Cup window... spend whatever it takes to make that happen. Too many teams get caught in that rut of being close, but not quite there. When you get close, pay up!
"Heir apparent to Andrei Markov", is that a thing now? I'd always seen Markov as a poor man's top pairing defenseman anyways, long-tenured perhaps but he's hardly legendary.
"Heir apparent to Andrei Markov", is that a thing now? I'd always seen Markov as a poor man's top pairing defenseman anyways, long-tenured perhaps but he's hardly legendary.