tigervixxxen
Optimism=Delusional
Siemens and Elliott are back now, Siemens only a few games though. I think Roy is reluctant to call anyone up unless he HAS to. I'm not sure anyone from LE gets a decent look this season.
I'm just saying that THAT single play isn't enough to prove that he isn't an NHL defenseman. Cause a lot better players do it too.
Anyway, I'm fine if he gets waived/traded whatever, but I'm also fine with him being our 6/7th d-man.
Like it or not, I'm pretty much 80% positive Holden-Guenin will either be 3rd pairing or at least in the bottom 4 of Roy's 8 man squad to start next season as well.
I will say that both have marginally improved since the start of the season, but neither bring much confidence of ever being much more than suitable 3rd pairing guys.
That's why he is a third pairing guy. They will make mistakes. Otherwise they would be paid like top pairing guys.
Stuff like that is always gonna happen. We even saw SHEA WEBER doing the exact same thing in Pepsi Center last year.
http://video.nhl.com/videocenter/console?id=2012020221-475-h
Siemens and Elliott are back now, Siemens only a few games though. I think Roy is reluctant to call anyone up unless he HAS to. I'm not sure anyone from LE gets a decent look this season.
I can see no benefit to playing Holden any longer. At some point management has to decide they're over losing games because of lazy, incompetent plays like he makes and acquire better D. We have the cap space, quit being so GD cheap. Teams are beating us simply by keying on Holden's (and other D's) ineptitude. He's not even good at being a pylon, calling him that would imply he causes a skater to go around him.
I can see no benefit to playing Holden any longer. At some point management has to decide they're over losing games because of lazy, incompetent plays like he makes and acquire better D. We have the cap space, quit being so GD cheap. Teams are beating us simply by keying on Holden's (and other D's) ineptitude. He's not even good at being a pylon, calling him that would imply he causes a skater to go around him.
I can see no benefit to playing Holden any longer. At some point management has to decide they're over losing games because of lazy, incompetent plays like he makes and acquire better D. We have the cap space, quit being so GD cheap. Teams are beating us simply by keying on Holden's (and other D's) ineptitude. He's not even good at being a pylon, calling him that would imply he causes a skater to go around him.
I am the biggest Holden hater, but the guy isn't lazy. He just doesn't have the skill level, most notably the brain to succeed in the NHL level.
I do agree that a broken Ryan Wilson would contribute far more than a healthy Holden, but not by much.
Two things you must also understand,
- We're still a rebuilding (currently ending) club, even though we sit 3rd in the best division in hockey. We still need to look for long term than trade away Siemens, Elliott, Bigras, Barrie for more established higher paid defensemen.
- As a rebuilding club that is currently on the exit path, majority of these type of teams WILL lack depth. Trust me, I saw it with Chicago, Pittsburgh, Anaheim, and St. Louis. Only when some of their other (later round) draft prospects started developing into NHL players did those teams have the depth to change from a playoff contender team to a Cup contender team.
We have drafted a ton of defensemen the last 3 years including an entire draft last year. Not saying any of them will be the next Seabrook or Letang, but all of them (more of the notable ones) do have the potential to be better than the likes of Guenin, Holden, Wilson, and maybe even Hejda.
This is a very important point to remember. The Avs have to get better at developing their 2+ round picks (only 2 of those picks have contributed to the Avs in a significant manner since 2006... Barrie and Galiardi). We have a solid core now, but we will not likely be getting top 10 picks anymore. Usually in drafts after the 10-15 range the players all have flaws and need to be developed to hit on the pick.
Complete oversight Yes you are right. Still point stands.
A 37.5% success rate from 2nd round picks seems pretty good to me.
This is a very important point to remember. The Avs have to get better at developing their 2+ round picks (only 2 of those picks have contributed to the Avs in a significant manner since 2006... Barrie and Galiardi). We have a solid core now, but we will not likely be getting top 10 picks anymore. Usually in drafts after the 10-15 range the players all have flaws and need to be developed to hit on the pick.
20%... 2 out of 10 since 2006 so far (not counting Bigras or any of 2013 draft). 1 out of 36 on 3rd+ round picks (Bournival might make that 2).
Does it? For instance, and I'm only going to do one team since I should be studying, St. Louis has picked:Complete oversight Yes you are right. Still point stands.
You're right the Avs need to get better in the development aspect, but a lot of our prospects are too young (the biggest outcome IMO) or have had injury problems to make a direct impact losing close to half a season in development.
All our goalers are too young and are not NHL ready, Aittokallio is the closest and still needs at least one to two more years of seasoning.
You refering to Barrie? I gotta say I think Olver is a success considering he was a 5th round pick and has a decent number of NHL games under his belt. Honestly rather see him up here than McLeod or Bordeleau at times.
Does it? For instance, and I'm only going to do one team since I should be studying, St. Louis has picked:
-William Carrier '13
-Tom Vannelli '13
-Samuel Kurker '12
-Dmitrij Jaskin '11
-Ty Rattie '11
-Joel Edmundson '11
-Sebastian Wannstrom '10
-Brett Ponich '09
-Jake Allen '08
-Philip McRae '08
-Simon Hjalmarsson '07
-Tomas Kana '06
-Scott Jackson '05
Not exactly a glowing list. In that time the Avs managed to pull Stastny and O'Reilly out of the 2nd round.
When Bordeleau got the major.
St. Louis built their core completely differently, and they are deep enough that some high level picks are not able to make the roster... thus can be used as trade bait. They also started the rebuild much earlier.... Backes, Stempniak, McClement, Polak, Nikitin, and Bishop were all 2nd+ round picks that either contributed directly or indirectly to their re-build (they also complied 1st round picks which the Avs didn't do).