BenchBrawl
Registered User
- Jul 26, 2010
- 30,886
- 13,680
Nice pick with Fisher, I would have picked him up if I didn't have two RHS center already.
I'll grab a spare defenseman.... Walt Buswell
Hard to tell just how good he was because we don't have records of all-star voting for the late 1920s, but he seemed to have a fair amount of star power.Leafs select d alex smith who won a cup in 1927 with the senators
He played both wings, right?
We just need two more GMs to do it. A 4-GM MLD we have done before. But, ideally 8 teams.... interest in doing an MLD after the completion of the playoffs? Maybe break off for a month or so and then start up an MLD if the interest was there.
On WC he played mostly LW, but in Czech wiki he is listed as RW.He played both wings, right?
I've finally gotten around to finish special teams stats for 1940-41.
Two most surprising things: Nick Metz led the league in PPP while Lynn Patrick led the league in SHP. You'd probably think it would be vice versa based on their reputation.
Bill Cowley, and the Kraut line are ES monsters.
Leaf Lander just shot me a message on FB.
He will list pick:
Jim Conacher, C
Sorry to hear that bud. Hopefully it's short term and we'll be on the other side of this craziness soon.
Sorry to hear that, hope you'll be OK.
That sucks man. I know the feeling though, both my wife and I have been laid off for a little over 3 weeks now and who knows how long this will last. And with a 16 month old son to feed, a mortgage and bills to pay and loads of groceries to buy with both of us (hopefully just temporarily) out of work it has been a pretty stressful time to say the least. Thankfully I’m receiving EI benefits but that’s only so much and only good for so long.
Scary times and an uncertain future. I’m thankful to have this ATD as a hobby. It’s a nice little daily escape from the current reality.
This is great, but why and how are you taking the time to compile this when it's on nhl.com?
I just finished 1939-40 special teams data. It took me around 30-40 hours, though it should be faster going forward as I've worked out a process. I reconstructed the numbers using primary sources (aka newspapers of the time) and cross-checked it with the NHL.com boxscores. I'm damn confident that my data is significantly more accurate than the NHL.
Of course, I can't guarantee 100% accuracy (I'm confident in over 97% accuracy). Though, in this case any error is due in part to some games having pretty terrible recaps from the papers that you simply can't conclude anything (I'd say less than 10 games where I was unsure). I made many safeguards to guard against any errors from my part (if you're interested I can tell you in more detail).
The papers I used, ranked from highest quality of game reports to lowest quality, were Daily Boston Globe, New York Times, Chicago Daily Tribune, New York Herald, Globe and Mail, Detroit Free Press, Toronto Daily Star, La Presse, Le Devoir, and Montreal Gazette.
The data is on an Excel sheet. Along with special teams stats, I've also included the ES VsX benchmark and some of the top ES scorers from that year. Time to move on to 1940-41.
Two or three years ago, @overpass was trying to compile special teams data by looking at the newly released NHL.com numbers. But, the 1948-49 season raised some suspicion because the Bruins had an abnormally low number of PPG scored. And then it turned out that suspicious looking numbers were common preceding 1948-49. So, it was determined NHL.com numbers before 1950-51 were inaccurate. That's why when I released the ES VsX benchmarks for the first time, they only went up to 1949-50.
As for my methodology, from my post when I first posted my 1939-40 data.
I have to say though that the Toronto Daily Star, La Presse, and Le Devoir are useless. The Montreal Gazette was ranked last in 1939-40 because there were a bunch of papers missing on Google Archives, but when the papers are available (as was the case for 1940-41), their game reports are decent.
Maybe for 1940-41 there werent many mistakes but i found a quite a few differences for 1939-40Did you check these against NHL.com? I did, and they're remarkably similar.
International Hockey Legends said:Frantisek was a stalwart defenseman for the Czechs in a career that spanned 17 years. He was especially dominant in the early 1960s, helping Czechoslovakia capture the bronze medal in 1964. He was a regular player on the national team from 1957 through 1966. He was even named the best defenseman at both the 1964 and 1965 World Championships, and was inducted into the IIHF Hall of Fame in 2004. Father David Bauer, the legendary Canadian national team coach of the 1960s, considered Tikal the best defensman in Europe in the 1960s.