Dr Pepper
Registered User
I also want this thread to stay as-is. Draft threads are cluttered enough even the picks themselves are getting drowned by ongoing debates.
Most people seem to want this to stay as is.
Count me in in the ''keep this thread alive'' clan
I think we should keep it. Draft threads are piling up so much, keeping as much as possible out of them can only help. This thread has the duel benefit of a) keeping the draft thread under control, and b) letting people who want to discuss this not have their posts drowned.
I also want this thread to stay as-is. Draft threads are cluttered enough even the picks themselves are getting drowned by ongoing debates.
Dawson City Nuggets
Michel Goulet-Gilbert Perreault-Mike Bossy
________-________-Dino Ciccarelli
________-________-Jere Lehtinen
________-________-________
Frantisek Pospisil-Cy Wentworth
________-________
________-________
Clint Benedict
________
Think I'm set on RW for a while, time to build the rest of my team. I'm thinking 2nd line C should be next, unless a gem at LW is spotted.
Or should I focus more on padding my blueline, which is more or less average at the moment?
BPA unless it's RW or goal. No need to rush any position yet.
Are you saying that exclusively in reference to his team, or as a general comment on team-building philosophy in this draft? I've been keeping a curious eye on your team and they way you're building it, so the comment piqued my interest.
Specifically to this circumstance. That said, it is also my general philosophy. I always intend with my 4 picks in the late 2nd/early 3rd to come away with two defencemen, but because of how other people picked, the gap between the best forwards and the best defencemen was just too great, so I went with four forwards. But then with my 4th and 5th rounders, I clearly needed defencemen, so I bit the bullet and went that route, irregardless of who there was. Johnson was good value, but Zubov was not as good, but I felt that if I didn't take him, the only way to get a true PPQB was to go with a specialist. So, I guess my strategy is to try to get the best player, but, I have biases to needs and overall goals.
Think I'm set on RW for a while, time to build the rest of my team. I'm thinking 2nd line C should be next, unless a gem at LW is spotted.
Or should I focus more on padding my blueline, which is more or less average at the moment?
I don't like St. Louis on the line, his speed actually works against him, especially as he is best when using his linemates on the rush. He could easily be often off-side with slower linemates. You'd be better off getting a center who can score and anchor the second line to St. Louis.
So far I have Robinson and Stanley on my blueline. If I was to draft a dman, what route do ppl think I should go? Defensive or offensive or balanced 3rd to pair with Robinson? or to start off my 2nd pairing?
Anybody else think drafting coaches is pointless since we do all the line and units and built our team for our strategy all by ourselves?
I would keep Robinson and Stanley together.
Anybody else think drafting coaches is pointless since we do all the line and units and built our team for our strategy all by ourselves?
Maltsev is the better offensive player. Go with him.
What do you guys think of this?
Denneny - Keats - Watson at ES.
Denneny - Keats - Martinec on the PP.
I can't decide whether or not Bailey is a good fit on my top line or if I'd be better off starting a second line with him.
Blake-Howe-Bailey
Thoughts?