jarek
Registered User
- Aug 15, 2009
- 10,004
- 238
Ok, now I am extremely confused. What makes me a detractor of league strength affecting scoring?
"Player X played in a weaker league, so his scoring finishes suck compared to player Y."
Ok, now I am extremely confused. What makes me a detractor of league strength affecting scoring?
What makes me a detractor of league strength affecting scoring?
The Trail lists the full teams for a couple of years, and gives some more info in bios, but for the most part the info comes from Total Hockey.As for Fredrickson's PCHA all stars, that's odd, because SIHR has nothing on his ASTs (which I also find odd). Where did BM67 get this information?
EDIT: Ah, The Trail. OK, fair enough.
"Player X played in a weaker league, so his scoring finishes suck compared to player Y."
Heh. Obviously Pratt was a crappy golfer, but I'm not sure what that's supposed to say about his intelligence. At any rate, Frank Frederickson seems to have been a quite explosive athlete - big, strong and fast.
.
Damn, I wanted Babe Pratt at 280. Guess that was far fetched - he's a legit #2 in this.
The Garnish Phantoms select: Left Winger Kevin Stevens
1990-91 2nd team All Star
1991-92 1st team All Star
1992-93 2nd team All Star
#2 in the NHL in goals created in 1991-92
2 time Stanley Cup Champion
726 points and 1470 PIMs in 874 regular season games
106 points and 170s PIMs in 103 playoff games
Not a bad power forward to pick up at this point, but "goals created" is a useless stat IMO.
He'd be a fairly low-end #2 since his Hart Trophy was during a war year. But I'm extremely happy to have him as a #3.
Don't worry, Eric Lindros will see a lot of him when our teams play each other.
Any thoughts on moving Sittler to the 2nd line and going with Olmstead-Litzenberger-Geoffrion
Well as you can probably tell, Litzenberger is a much weaker #1 center than Sittler, and Sittler isn't even among elite company.
You have to look at the line as a whole tough. Almost every team in this have at least one first liner who is usually suited as a 2nd liner. One of the many changes for having a 40 team league (Although Litzenberger was used as a 1st liner last year with much lesser linemates)
You want at least one member of your top line to be good at handling the puck. It's usually the center, but not always. Is Litzenberger (or Geoffrion) really the guy you want to try to beat ATD top pairing defensemen through the neutral zone?
Any thoughts on moving Sittler to the 2nd line and going with Olmstead-Litzenberger-Geoffrion
Litz was more goalscorer than playmaker, meaning that this line would depend an awful lot on Olmstead for playmaking. Bad idea.
I thought hard about drafting Litzenberger at #260 as legit power forwards are very thin at this point in the draft, but what I found on Litz suggested that he was not actually a physical player or puckwinner - just big and lanky. I sort of got away with Litzenberger as the primary puckwinner on the second line of my ATD#10 team (which won the championship), but in truth, I'd have drafted him if I still thought he was a power forward.
Stick with Sittler at center on your first line. Litzenberger is a good pick here (his offensive peak is excellent whether or not he can crush someone along the boards) and gives you positional flexibility in how you build the other pieces of your second line - a quite undervalued quality to have in a player during the process of the draft, especially a draft as thin as this one.
The Thistles challenged Ottawa again in March 1905. The Silver Seven were without the services of star player Frank McGee and the challengers won the first game of the series by a score of 9-3. Ottawa, with McGee back in the lineup, won the next two games to send the Thistles home empty-handed for a second time.
select Hall of Famer
#8 Rusty Crawford D
He was know for his speed aggressive play and longevity