Confirmed with Link: "As The Flyers Turn" - Front Office Deck Chairs Discussion Thread (Camillo Out/Sharp In/LeClair In)

renberg

Registered User
Dec 31, 2003
6,842
6,923
Lewes Delaware
forums.hfboards.com
Culture does come with a club when management has a plan for the type of play that it wants to see on the ice. The “Flyers Way” of the past was built on team concept. They played for the win not the personal stats. The goal scored was great but so was the assist leading to the goal. Clarke passed up shots when Barber, Leach or whoever was in a better place to score. Lindros scored his share but also set up Leclair, Renberg and others. What mattered was the goal for the Flyers. This attitude has been absent here for a while; particularly since Giroux was dealt. There’s been too much egotism on the ice. The play of Hayes, Provorov and TDA are symptomatic of this.
Tortorella was hired to sort some of this out. After a season of him we can see the obvious as to who is not a fit as a team player. One of them is already gone. Others are soon to follow. Any club can lose but losing with players that are dogs on and off of the ice is difficult to tolerate. It’s time to rebuild- with players who work together as teammate. Ones who check their egos at the door and play for the team to win. Guys who figure that a good night is a W and a bad night in an L no matter what the stats sheet says.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ghosts Beer

Rebels57

Former Flyers fan
Sponsor
Sep 28, 2014
76,695
123,239
On the "culture" topic, though:

It's something that forms organically. You don't go looking to draft CULTURE or hire some hackneyed old Masshole coach under the impression that he's the CULTURE GURU who is going to build it for you. Hell, the whole Vigneault/Kevin Hayes/Kevin's friends experiment was an effort to instill a culture and all it did was alienate the existing leadership and wreck the team. Fun!

Leaders emerge in unexpected ways. Friendships and bonds are born from proximity and adversity and success. There's no playbook for that, and anyone trying to sell you one is a huckster.

If anything, culture is something you can curate, not construct or install. You draft the best hockey players you can. You keep some solid people in place to guide the atmosphere. If someone is clashing with the rest of the room, you stamp it down or pluck them out.

Using some nebulous concept of "culture" as a guiding force for hockey ops is stupid. You don't create a "winning culture" without winning. You don't win without talent. You can control the influx of talent. You can't predict how personalities will change and co-exist over time.

They're at square 0. Obsessing over culture right now is like rattling on about feng shui before you've even sourced the timber from which you'll build the house.

Please Tweet this at all of the usual idiots on that cursed platform.
 

1865

Alpha Couturier
Feb 28, 2005
16,848
5,610
Chester, UK
There was an element of us joking about "former Flyer front office" attitudes but this is getting a little silly. Who else? Scotty Hartnell for skating coach? Forsberg for fitness coach? Chuck Fletcher for GM?

Fletcher on the Flyers failure:

"I saw it coming a little bit at the end, Elliotte. Obviously, we hadn't had a lot of success the last two season. There was a lot of noise, and dissatisfaction in the marketplace. I had a lot of conversations with my boss, so I was certainly aware that, you know, things could happen. So you're aware of it."

You only saw it coming at the end Chuck? No wonder you're the worst negotiator in the world, everyone runs rings around you before you know they're in the room.
 

BernieParent

In misery of redwings of suckage for a long time
Mar 13, 2009
24,669
44,292
Chasm of Sar (north of Montreal, Qc)
You can't spell culture without 'cult'.

But seriously, as @Magua said, asking the FO to explain what they mean by culture is akin to the blind men describing an elephant. Yes, good teams should have each other's backs, stick up for each other, play as hard in their own zone as in the offensive zone, but the Flyers neither created nor defined this. We can't even say that the hallowed BSBs played an honest game; they played dirty hockey, they cheapshotted opponents, and they dove, just like other clubs. And I say this as someone who became a fan of this organization.

I like some of the core elements of Tortorella's approach. Did we not appreciate him taking Hayes to task for lacklustre play? But Tortorella is a cartoon-character type for hockey culture. A line-up can't be the Borg; i.e., a homogeneous entity of 200-foot shot-blockers grinding out 2-1 wins 82 games a season. And these head games, like sitting a player in his home town, have a short shelf life.

Yes, give me a line-up of players who keep being pushed 12 months a year to be at top shape and to be constantly improving their skills, who are focused on wins instead of personal stats (nodding to you, @deadhead), who are responsible defensively in all 3 zones, who don't take stupid penalties because they can't control themselves but will stick up for each other when the other team is cheapshotting them, and who are relentless in getting and keeping the puck. But let me also watch offensive creativity and a smattering of highlight-reel individual efforts as part of a well-rounded modern NHL lineup.
 
Last edited:

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
128,063
165,959
Armored Train
Culture does come with a club when management has a plan for the type of play that it wants to see on the ice. The “Flyers Way” of the past was built on team concept. They played for the win not the personal stats. The goal scored was great but so was the assist leading to the goal. Clarke passed up shots when Barber, Leach or whoever was in a better place to score. Lindros scored his share but also set up Leclair, Renberg and others. What mattered was the goal for the Flyers. This attitude has been absent here for a while; particularly since Giroux was dealt. There’s been too much egotism on the ice. The play of Hayes, Provorov and TDA are symptomatic of this.
Tortorella was hired to sort some of this out. After a season of him we can see the obvious as to who is not a fit as a team player. One of them is already gone. Others are soon to follow. Any club can lose but losing with players that are dogs on and off of the ice is difficult to tolerate. It’s time to rebuild- with players who work together as teammate. Ones who check their egos at the door and play for the team to win. Guys who figure that a good night is a W and a bad night in an L no matter what the stats sheet says.

Flyers management despises playmakers and creativity and has been chasing mindless turrets, so this is the "culture" they've wanted.
 

blackjackmulligan

Registered User
Jun 17, 2022
2,574
1,028
Yeah, sure. The market is huge for 33 year old face punchers.


SEASONINITIAL BASE SALARYINITIAL CAP HITSIGNING BONUSBUYOUT COSTPOST-BUYOUT EARNINGSSAVINGSCAP HIT (
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
PHI)
2024-25$1,500,000$1,750,000$0$500,000$500,000$1,000,000$750,000
2025-26$1,500,000$1,750,000$0$500,000$500,000$1,000,000$750,000
2026-27$0$0$0$500,000$500,000-$500,000$500,000
2027-28$0$0$0$500,000$500,000-$500,000$500,000
TOTAL$3,000,000$3,500,000$0$2,000,000$2,000,000$1,000,000$2,500,000
better off waiving him
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
49,215
21,617
You can't spell culture without 'cult'.

But seriously, as @Magua said, asking the FO to explain what they mean by culture is akin to the blind men describing an elephant. Yes, good teams should have each other's backs, stick up for each other, play as hard in their own zone as in the offensive zone, but the Flyers neither created nor defined this. We can't even say that the hallowed BSBs played an honest game; they played dirty hockey, they cheapshotted opponents, and they dove, just like other clubs. And I say this as someone who became a fan of this organization.

I like some of the core elements of Tortorella's approach. Did we not appreciate him taking Hayes to task for lacklustre play? But Tortorella is a cartoon-character type for hockey culture. A line-up can't be the Borg; i.e., a homogeneous entity of 200-foot shot-blockers grinding out 2-1 wins 82 games a season. And these head games, like sitting a player in his home town, have a short shelf life.

Yes, give me a line-up of players who keep being pushed 12 months a year to be at top shape and to be constantly improving their skills, who are focused on wins instead of personal stats (nodding to you, @deadhead), who are responsible defensively in all 3 zones, who don't take stupid penalties because they can't control themselves but will stick up for each other when the other team is cheapshotting them, and who are relentless in getting and keeping the puck. But let me also watch offensive creativity and a smattering of highlight-reel individual efforts as part of a well-rounded modern NHL lineup.
I think this "smothering creativity is a myth."
First you have to have offensively talented players.
Come back in two years when the Flyers add some talent and the kids they are currently playing grow up.

If they trade TK, Laughton and Hayes, with JVR gone, they're going to struggle to score goals unless Couts and Atkinson are 100%, and Foerster and Brink are the real thing, because there aren't going to be many other sources of offense other than Frost, Farabee and Tippett. And that will have nothing to do with the scheme.

Vegas was 14th in GF, Carolina 15th. Why aren't people whining about Brind"Amour and Cassidy stifling offense?
Because they score enough to win games.

CBJ
2016-17: 6th in GF
2017-18: 16th in GF (after adding Panarin)
2018-19: 12th in GF
2019-20: 28th (after Panarin, Duchene, Duclair, Dzingel left, Atkinson missed half the season)
Funny how scoring falls off when you don't have a 1st line. Like the Flyers last season!

A Torts team is never going to lead the league in scoring, but with the right talent can be a top ten goal scoring team.
The mistake in CBJ was rushing the process, I think that's something Torts and Briere discussed, to keep building the "right way," bringing in young talent and develop it and don't try to rush things with high priced free agents and asset bleeding trades.
 

Audible Velvet

Registered User
Jul 9, 2015
2,802
3,645
Philthadelphia
You can't spell culture without 'cult'.

But seriously, as @Magua said, asking the FO to explain what they mean by culture is akin to the blind men describing an elephant. Yes, good teams should have each other's backs, stick up for each other, play as hard in their own zone as in the offensive zone, but the Flyers neither created nor defined this. We can't even say that the hallowed BSBs played an honest game; they played dirty hockey, they cheapshotted opponents, and they dove, just like other clubs. And I say this as someone who became a fan of this organization.

I like some of the core elements of Tortorella's approach. Did we not appreciate him taking Hayes to task for lacklustre play? But Tortorella is a cartoon-character type for hockey culture. A line-up can't be the Borg; i.e., a homogeneous entity of 200-foot shot-blockers grinding out 2-1 wins 82 games a season. And these head games, like sitting a player in his home town, have a short shelf life.

Yes, give me a line-up of players who keep being pushed 12 months a year to be at top shape and to be constantly improving their skills, who are focused on wins instead of personal stats (nodding to you, @deadhead), who are responsible defensively in all 3 zones, who don't take stupid penalties because they can't control themselves but will stick up for each other when the other team is cheapshotting them, and who are relentless in getting and keeping the puck. But let me also watch offensive creativity and a smattering of highlight-reel individual efforts as part of a well-rounded modern NHL lineup.
Right on, Bern!
 
  • Like
Reactions: BernieParent

blackjackmulligan

Registered User
Jun 17, 2022
2,574
1,028
I think this "smothering creativity is a myth."
First you have to have offensively talented players.
Come back in two years when the Flyers add some talent and the kids they are currently playing grow up.

If they trade TK, Laughton and Hayes, with JVR gone, they're going to struggle to score goals unless Couts and Atkinson are 100%, and Foerster and Brink are the real thing, because there aren't going to be many other sources of offense other than Frost, Farabee and Tippett. And that will have nothing to do with the scheme.

Vegas was 14th in GF, Carolina 15th. Why aren't people whining about Brind"Amour and Cassidy stifling offense?
Because they score enough to win games.

CBJ
2016-17: 6th in GF
2017-18: 16th in GF (after adding Panarin)
2018-19: 12th in GF
2019-20: 28th (after Panarin, Duchene, Duclair, Dzingel left, Atkinson missed half the season)
Funny how scoring falls off when you don't have a 1st line. Like the Flyers last season!

A Torts team is never going to lead the league in scoring, but with the right talent can be a top ten goal scoring team.
The mistake in CBJ was rushing the process, I think that's something Torts and Briere discussed, to keep building the "right way," bringing in young talent and develop it and don't try to rush things with high priced free agents and asset bleeding trades.
will torts still be here in in the 2025/2026 season?

they didnt rush anything.
 

Chinatown88

Daniels QB3
Jan 17, 2012
24,009
46,815
The Universe
You can't spell culture without 'cult'.

But seriously, as @Magua said, asking the FO to explain what they mean by culture is akin to the blind men describing an elephant. Yes, good teams should have each other's backs, stick up for each other, play as hard in their own zone as in the offensive zone, but the Flyers neither created nor defined this. We can't even say that the hallowed BSBs played an honest game; they played dirty hockey, they cheapshotted opponents, and they dove, just like other clubs. And I say this as someone who became a fan of this organization.

I like some of the core elements of Tortorella's approach. Did we not appreciate him taking Hayes to task for lacklustre play? But Tortorella is a cartoon-character type for hockey culture. A line-up can't be the Borg; i.e., a homogeneous entity of 200-foot shot-blockers grinding out 2-1 wins 82 games a season. And these head games, like sitting a player in his home town, have a short shelf life.

Yes, give me a line-up of players who keep being pushed 12 months a year to be at top shape and to be constantly improving their skills, who are focused on wins instead of personal stats (nodding to you, @deadhead), who are responsible defensively in all 3 zones, who don't take stupid penalties because they can't control themselves but will stick up for each other when the other team is cheapshotting them, and who are relentless in getting and keeping the puck. But let me also watch offensive creativity and a smattering of highlight-reel individual efforts as part of a well-rounded modern NHL lineup.
"He's on fire!" - NBA Jam
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
49,215
21,617
will torts still be here in in the 2025/2026 season?

they didnt rush anything.
I think Torts will play out his contract, whether he'll want to coach past then will be a mutual decision, at that point he may well want to retire to his farm, rescue dogs and be a senior advisor.

I've never got the feeling that Torts was "forced" on Briere, the two seem to have had come to the same conclusion last fall, that the team needed to be rebuilt "the right way." Torts is on board with a patient rebuild, with the focus on teaching and development, not winning now. Winning will be the byproduct of "trusting the process."
 

blackjackmulligan

Registered User
Jun 17, 2022
2,574
1,028
I think Torts will play out his contract, whether he'll want to coach past then will be a mutual decision, at that point he may well want to retire to his farm, rescue dogs and be a senior advisor.

I've never got the feeling that Torts was "forced" on Briere, the two seem to have had come to the same conclusion last fall, that the team needed to be rebuilt "the right way." Torts is on board with a patient rebuild, with the focus on teaching and development, not winning now. Winning will be the byproduct of "trusting the process."
it is never a mutual decision. He is a coach. That is all he knows.

I would bet my left nut if Danny was allowed to bring in his own coach he would have.

Torts actions will show what he is on board with. Is he who you really want teaching and development, the on ice skills that is? Still baffles me they refuse to hire a PP coach.
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
128,063
165,959
Armored Train
I think this "smothering creativity is a myth."
First you have to have offensively talented players.
Come back in two years when the Flyers add some talent and the kids they are currently playing grow up.

If they trade TK, Laughton and Hayes, with JVR gone, they're going to struggle to score goals unless Couts and Atkinson are 100%, and Foerster and Brink are the real thing, because there aren't going to be many other sources of offense other than Frost, Farabee and Tippett. And that will have nothing to do with the scheme.

Vegas was 14th in GF, Carolina 15th. Why aren't people whining about Brind"Amour and Cassidy stifling offense?
Because they score enough to win games.

CBJ
2016-17: 6th in GF
2017-18: 16th in GF (after adding Panarin)
2018-19: 12th in GF
2019-20: 28th (after Panarin, Duchene, Duclair, Dzingel left, Atkinson missed half the season)
Funny how scoring falls off when you don't have a 1st line. Like the Flyers last season!

A Torts team is never going to lead the league in scoring, but with the right talent can be a top ten goal scoring team.
The mistake in CBJ was rushing the process, I think that's something Torts and Briere discussed, to keep building the "right way," bringing in young talent and develop it and don't try to rush things with high priced free agents and asset bleeding trades.

It's not a myth. That reality has been proven to you repeatedly.

They're going to struggle to score goals either way because Tortorella has them playing a style that restricts offensive opportunities. Tortorella has stated that he thinks this team needs 10-12 goal PK specialists, not offensive talent. That's where his head is at.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad