Cowumbus
Registered User
He will be playing with really good players here too.
Not ELITE players though, at least not yes I believe is his point. Toews/Kane are better than any forward on our roster.
He will be playing with really good players here too.
Not ELITE players though, at least not yes I believe is his point. Toews/Kane are better than any forward on our roster.
Not ELITE players though, at least not yes I believe is his point. Toews/Kane are better than any forward on our roster.
Not ELITE players though, at least not yes I believe is his point. Toews/Kane are better than any forward on our roster.
Toews is not that good anymore
Panarin - Wennberg - Atkinson (Bjorkstrand)
Jones - Weresnki
Bobrosky
That seems pretty elite to me.
Panarin - Wennberg - Atkinson (Bjorkstrand)
Jones - Weresnki
Bobrosky
That seems pretty elite to me.
Panarin-Wennberg-Kovalchuk
god I'm going to bust
We should acquire Tyler Johnson and call up Abramov.
Panarin (5'11") - Johnson (5'9") - Atkinson (5'8")
Calvert (5'11") - Tynan (5'8") - Abramov (5'9")
Maybe re-sign Gagner (5'11").
Panarin played more with Anisimov than Toews. I think Wennberg's game will compliment his very well. Main difference will be the defense focusing on him rather than Kane.
People think we won this trade.... how?
We got a inferior two way player and we probably will only have him for two years. Also he is older and stats could have been inflated playing with Kane.
Get with the program! If Jarmo makes a move, it's automatically good.
No dissension allowed. Got it?
Why would we want a washed up Kovy, while most likely giving up assets and overpaying to get him? Serious.
Why would we want a washed up Kovy, while most likely giving up assets and overpaying to get him? Serious.
If you just take everything after the equal signs and put them in the YouTube tag it should work [ YT ] CONTENT [ / YT ] (without the spaces)
Okay I get what you're saying, you just need to work on your delivery, you let your emotions get the best of you and you come off like the world's biggest pessimist.No I said you don't know what you're going to get like when we traded for players such as Carter or Gaborik. I agree we need offensive players but my point is I do not like the fact that we can lose Panarin in 2 years and we have to trade Saad to get Panarin for an unknown amount of time.
I think people here are blinded and assuming things. Just because I say I think the trade was a lateral move does not mean I think Panarin is not good. He is close to if not elite offensively but I like Saads all around game and contract more.
Ideally Panarin re-signs for cheap, produces in Cbus, and plays multiple years here. I don't know how likely that is though, and for that reason I'm not the biggest fan of the trade.
Question, can you re-sign at any point in time? I'd Panarin re-signed for 4-5 more years I would feel a lot better about it.
Panarin - Wennberg - Atkinson (Bjorkstrand)
Jones - Weresnki
Bobrosky
That seems pretty elite to me.
Why do people think Panarin is a better fit? I completely disagree, but am wondering peoples thoughts on why. I could be swayed
Then why weren't Saad's stats inflated playing with Chicago? Panarin is just flat out better (more skilled) than Saad. As others have said, Saad is who he is.
Bob yes. Defense, maybe, maybe Jones. Other than that who?