Gurglesons
Registered User
Always thought we should've kept Pearson, he was never a problem imo
Super annoying trade.
Always thought we should've kept Pearson, he was never a problem imo
Always thought we should've kept Pearson, he was never a problem imo
I take a perverse pleasure in seeing Reaves be a contributor on a team that's doing well in the playoffs after seeing how Sullivan misused him here and we heard cries of "he's the type of player Cup contenders can't have on the roster".
Maybe if Sullivan didn't expect every single player to play a specific way or he'd be in the dog house, we wouldn't be in the situation we're in. Sullivan's rigidity is causing us to get rid of otherwise useful players just because they happen to play a style that's different than Sullivan's "fast, fast, fast tiny winger fast" approach.
At times, Reaves is basically doing what ZAR does on the 4th line.Reaves sucks though. You're being blinded by the announcers giving him praise and a young team falling into his BS. That shit never and will never fly in Pittsburgh.
Reaves sucks though. You're being blinded by the announcers giving him praise and a young team falling into his BS. That shit never and will never fly in Pittsburgh.
I mean, I'm watching the Vegas games? He's effective at what he does. I get that with the whole analytics craze, some folks think guys like ZAR do more for a team than Reaves, but I still think there's an element Reaves brings (and no, not fighting) that doesn't show up in the analytics that a guy like ZAR or any number of vanilla 4th liners don't.
Vegas is outscoring the other team by 5 because of their top three lines. It ain't because Reaves is acting like a dumbass.
Don't recall saying he was the reason they're winning? I said he's good enough to be a contributor to a team that's doing well and not be this hindrance like people made him out to be.
He was a hindrance for our style of team. Vegas plays a different game.
Reaves ain't carrying the 4th line.
Also to expound on that point. DeBoer is playing Reaves around the same as Sullivan did here.
Maybe the bolded is the problem. Maybe Sullivan should adapt to the times when his "style" isn't resulting in success. Vegas plays just as fast as the Pens, just as tenacious. So it's not like Reaves is on a team full of plodding, Corey Perry/Milan Lucic-esque skaters. So maybe Sullivan should adjust whatever the f*** it is he's trying to get us to play when it stops working two playoffs in a row?
As for playing time, again, never said Reaves should be playing 15 minutes per night. I'm just saying he's showing he's not a hindrance to his team in whatever minutes he gets. I'd certainly have rather had him this year than two of our plugs that dressed regularly in the playoffs.
Tanev and who?
You can't remake a team with Crosby and Malkin. Every year we get people around here wishing for us to play a different style of hockey. Pittsburgh Penguins hockey is offensive stars leading the way. That's the way it has always been. That's the way I hope it will always be. Vegas is a solid team, but they are what is wrong with the game.
Also did anyone ever say Reaves was a hindrance? He's a 4th liner.
Our style of play doesn't really resemble the bolded. There's very little "offensive creativity" from this group. Unless Sid or Geno have the puck on their stick, it's a bunch of chip and chase, and take low danger/low percentage shots on net and hope for rebounds.
Yes, that seemed to be the common theme. That with him on the 4th line, we can't roll 4 lines and play "our game", whatever the f*** that is supposed to be at this point.
You can't look at how ZAR or Marleau performed in the playoffs and say that Reaves couldn't have done more than they did or that he would have dragged his lines more than they did.
Lehner with a shutout, so hot right now.
People blaming MAF is hilarious.Fleury’s agent is preparing another photo as we speak.
All Reaves does in VGK is crash the crease and wreak havoc on the forecheck. He did it well in St.Louis and now in VGK.Put me in the camp that Reaves could have had a much better stint in PIT
He was miscast. Even if you think he isn't that good. He was miscast.
All Reaves does in VGK is crash the crease and wreak havoc on the forecheck. He did it well in St.Louis and now in VGK.
But by some miracle, was not used properly in Pittsburgh even though he brought a lot of levity to the dressing room. He definitely was misused and miscast. The same way those morons did Oleksiak too.