Around the NHL 2023-2024

[ezcreepin]

This is the worst one, to me. Not only did we give up a 1st, we actively made the team worse by using him in net. That's being a little unfair to him, I guess, since with Buffalo that season he was probably a bit better than Halak or Elliott, but in the Blues uniform he was worse than either of them by every metric. Even if he had played at the level expected of him, it still wasn't a good trade. Halak and Elliott were both above average goalies and we move 2 picks, Halak, and more for a rental at the most volatile position when it wasn't even a real team weakness, despite whatever narrative existed around them.

But oh well. Spilled milk, we did win the Cup eventually anyway, whatever.

Nah I have to push back on this, the trade did make some sense at the time. Halak was traded to be the #1 here but was hurt way too often and only played in one series (also getting hurt). He had lost the good will of management because we were going to Elliott every time the playoffs approached, and the whole reason in getting Halak was because he was so dominant with Montreal. Elliott, who did have good seasons, had to be relegated to the AHL the previous year for his bad play. I think he did hold his own in the playoffs, but I don't think this team was super confident in him leading the team to a Stanley Cup.

I think the sentiment in management was that you have two good regular season goalies, but aren't comfortable running them in the playoffs because of the workload and possible injuries/bad play from one of the guys. So you trade for one of the best goalies in the league at the time, a guy who nearly beat Canada, a proven playoff performer, and his style just didn't work. NOW, I will say that we all had the same thoughts about Miller at the time as we do right now; he didn't seem like a great fit. But I think everything taken into context makes it reasonable and understandable why they would go out and get a goalie.

 

[Celtic Note]

I never said he was a playoff choker, I just said he didn't produce here. All his production in Washington was riding shotgun with Ovi and Backstrom, two of the best in their primes. It's not as easy as it sounds to play with those types of players though, so I get the argument.

I think Oshie is a really solid supporting player. But he's not a driver and we needed drivers. Brouwer wasn't that either, but Oshie was never going to be the guy he was in Washington here.

I think it was a waste of an asset for one run that had us beat a rival but in no way made us a Cup contender IMO.

I agree that we needed more upfront and as I have said numerous times (and frankly it’s getting old repeating it), we either didn’t target talent to take the team to the next level with that core or failed to do so.

 

[TheOrganist]

Nah I have to push back on this, the trade did make some sense at the time. Halak was traded to be the #1 here but was hurt way too often and only played in one series (also getting hurt). He had lost the good will of management because we were going to Elliott every time the playoffs approached, and the whole reason in getting Halak was because he was so dominant with Montreal. Elliott, who did have good seasons, had to be relegated to the AHL the previous year for his bad play. I think he did hold his own in the playoffs, but I don't think this team was super confident in him leading the team to a Stanley Cup.

I think the sentiment in management was that you have two good regular season goalies, but aren't comfortable running them in the playoffs because of the workload and possible injuries/bad play from one of the guys. So you trade for one of the best goalies in the league at the time, a guy who nearly beat Canada, a proven playoff performer, and his style just didn't work. NOW, I will say that we all had the same thoughts about Miller at the time as we do right now; he didn't seem like a great fit. But I think everything taken into context makes it reasonable and understandable why they would go out and get a goalie.

Halak was having a terrible year and was equally bad at the Olympics that year. I agree that was a move that everyone s*** on Armstrong for but like you, I also saw the rationale at the time.

 

[STL fan in MN]

Nah I have to push back on this, the trade did make some sense at the time. Halak was traded to be the #1 here but was hurt way too often and only played in one series (also getting hurt). He had lost the good will of management because we were going to Elliott every time the playoffs approached, and the whole reason in getting Halak was because he was so dominant with Montreal. Elliott, who did have good seasons, had to be relegated to the AHL the previous year for his bad play. I think he did hold his own in the playoffs, but I don't think this team was super confident in him leading the team to a Stanley Cup.

I think the sentiment in management was that you have two good regular season goalies, but aren't comfortable running them in the playoffs because of the workload and possible injuries/bad play from one of the guys. So you trade for one of the best goalies in the league at the time, a guy who nearly beat Canada, a proven playoff performer, and his style just didn't work. NOW, I will say that we all had the same thoughts about Miller at the time as we do right now; he didn't seem like a great fit. But I think everything taken into context makes it reasonable and understandable why they would go out and get a goalie.

Agreed that the need for a goalie made sense but Miller was a poor target. That’s easier to say now with hindsight but quite a few of us were saying it at the time too. I’m not sure there was an ideal target but management seemed hell bent on replacing Halak that they ignored an obvious red flag.

 

[ezcreepin]

Agreed that the need for a goalie made sense but Miller was a poor target. That’s easier to say now with hindsight but quite a few of us were saying it at the time too. I’m not sure there was an ideal target but management seemed hell bent on replacing Halak that they ignored an obvious red flag.

No for sure, I think a lot of us here said the fit didn't seem right, but it was clear that there wasn't confidence in the tandem despite their regular season success. It didn't work out in 2013-2014, but we did get a cup, so it's water under the bridge now.

 

[Hrkac Circus]

I’ve heard fans from other teams are cheering for us to get the WC2 spot to knock Vegas out of the playoffs.

 

[AvBuff]

I’ve heard fans from other teams are cheering for us to get the WC2 spot to knock Vegas out of the playoffs.

Yes we are. In the name of all that is holy, please knock Vegas out.

Feel free to resume the process tomorrow . . .

 

[Hrkac Circus]

Yes we are. In the name of all that is holy, please knock Vegas out.

Feel free to resume the process tomorrow . . .

Come on now, donate to the cause and give us two points tonight!

 

[AvBuff]

Come on now, donate to the cause and give us two points tonight!

Yeahhhh, after 8-2 in November, I doubt the Avs will be in a charitable mood.

Which means squat in this rivalry . . .

 

[Ted Hoffman]

I’ve heard fans from other teams are cheering for us to get the WC2 spot to knock Vegas out of the playoffs.

Fans of other teams should have learned across the years never to trust us to do what they want.

 

[shpongle falls]

Will Nashville just lose a ****ing game already? God I hate that team lol.

 

[Majorityof1]

Will Nashville just lose a ****ing game already? God I hate that team lol.

I wonder if the people who were happy when we didn't bring O'Reilly back at that contract are the same ones who think we need a 2C? And if they still don't want ROR?

 

[Celtic Note]

I wonder if the people who were happy were we didn't bring O'Reilly back at that contract are the same ones who think we need a 2C? And if they still think that?

I thought it was time to move on. And while we have a gaping hole at #2C, I am not sold on going out and getting one. I would much rather focus on D. But I am probably in the majority of one on that.

 

[BlueDream]

I thought it was time to move on. And while we have a gaping hole at #2C, I am not sold on going out and getting one. I would much rather focus on D. But I am probably in the majority of one on that.

Why not focus on both when we have the cap space for both?

 

[Linkens Mastery]

I thought it was time to move on. And while we have a gaping hole at #2C, I am not sold on going out and getting one. I would much rather focus on D. But I am probably in the majority of one on that.

I'd like to aim for both. The biggest questionmarks for me this off-season is if we start next season with one (or more) of Bolduc/Snuggy/Dvorsky in the lineup next season.

 

[MissouriMook]

Why not focus on both when we have the cap space for both?

I think the problem with doing that, unless you can free up even more space by moving a guy like Krug, is that you end up only being able to afford a 2/3 guy to fill the 2C slot and a 2/3 guy to fill the 1LD slot. We’re not going to be serious competitors next season, so if we are able to elevate the level of player we add for each by adding one next season and the other the following season (assuming that the cap continues to climb) I feel like you can maximize the bang for your buck.

 

[Celtic Note]

Why not focus on both when we have the cap space for both?

I would like to have space to temporarily take on bad contracts to move our own as we rebuild the backend. O and/or land an expensive top pairing guy. I think we can tackle #2C in a season or so.

 

[Linkens Mastery]

I would like to have space to temporarily take on bad contracts to move our own as we rebuild the backend. O and/or land an expensive top pairing guy. I think we can tackle #2C in a season or so.

I'd still like to tackle the 2C problem. Us forcing Buch into the Middle because we don't have enough quality center depth needs to stop.

 

[Celtic Note]

I'd still like to tackle the 2C problem. Us forcing Buch into the Middle because we don't have enough quality center depth needs to stop.

If we do it either needs to be a short term, cheap bandaid or a young guy yet to blossom IMO. We have guys on the farm who could be that guy in a few years. I don’t want to waste time on short term fixes personally. I just want to see growth and a future that isn’t like the Backes core where we were good but clearly not good enough, only to be teased with what could have been.

 

[542365]

I think Dallas is going to win the Cup if Oettinger gives them even an average performance in net(which he hasn’t really done this year.) Just so much quality depth both up front and on the back end.

 

[Blueston]

If we do it either needs to be a short term, cheap bandaid or a young guy yet to blossom IMO. We have guys on the farm who could be that guy in a few years. I don’t want to waste time on short term fixes personally. I just want to see growth and a future that isn’t like the Backes core where we were good but clearly not good enough, only to be teased with what could have been.

this is an area where i think we need a short term fix, bc getting a 2c who can help set up our young wingers needs to be priority or we aren't going to get best out of guys like bolduc and snuggy. schenn can i think stilll be effective winger but he can't handle 2c any more, and having only 1 center who can set up his linemates is not conducive to developing young wingers

 

[Xerloris]

If we make a trade I think it needs to be for a #1 LD but I see no reason we can't focus on FA #2C and a better LD alternative than what we have.

 

[Blueston]

If we make a trade I think it needs to be for a #1 LD but I see no reason we can't focus on FA #2C and a better LD alternative than what we have.

i ask this in all sincerity, other than hanifan is there any ufa d who is clearly better than krug or faulk? i hate them together but individually either of them is still quality player (contract aside). if we are going to upgrade on d in short term, it almost has to be by trade.

 

[Celtic Note]

this is an area where i think we need a short term fix, bc getting a 2c who can help set up our young wingers needs to be priority or we aren't going to get best out of guys like bolduc and snuggy. schenn can i think stilll be effective winger but he can't handle 2c any more, and having only 1 center who can set up his linemates is not conducive to developing young wingers

Looking at the projected UFA list, who fits that without getting a too long of term contract?

 

[Blueston]

Looking at the projected UFA list, who fits that without getting a too long of term contract?

wennberg? roslovic? maybe someone like monahan or lindholm gets caught without a chair? it's not a pretty list.