One of the many reasons why an asterisk is very reasonable this season.This bubble really hasn't been good for the top seeds. In a normal season I don't think a lot of these lower seeds make it like they have here.
This bubble really hasn't been good for the top seeds. In a normal season I don't think a lot of these lower seeds make it like they have here.
One of the many reasons why an asterisk is very reasonable this season.
No logical reason why this setup should benefit the worse teams more than the theoretically better ones. The better teams should try winning the games.
Agreed. Tampa had massive injury issues last year, and the playoff non-officiating favours a team like Torts' Columbus. If Tampa is healthy last year they beat Torts'Columbus (and the "officiating").Harder for a skill team to regain touch and chemistry than it is for a systems team with not that much talent to implement the defensive trap that is the only way they know how to win.
Of course there is variability every year but 2017-2018 8/8 teams with the better record won. In 2016-2017 the better record went 5-3. Last year was an anomaly IMO.
Being the "Home Team" doesn't have much impact this season. No rowdy fans to enhance a team's momentum. Last change does help, but that is also dependent on the flow of the game. More whistles, then you can line match more. Fewer whistles, then it comes down to how well you change on the fly.Last year was a complete anomaly.
this year I thing it is a few factors. You have players like Rask who have won it, and their heart just isn’t there with Covid. You have your top teams who I am sure weren’t going full tilt in seeding vs round robin, where it was must win.
I think those are two big reasons.
So if last year is an anomaly with no particular explanation for or conclusion drawn from it, why is this year's success of lower seeds an anomaly with a specific cause we can supposedly identify and draw conclusions from?Harder for a skill team to regain touch and chemistry than it is for a systems team with not that much talent to implement the defensive trap that is the only way they know how to win.
Of course there is variability every year but 2017-2018 8/8 teams with the better record won. In 2016-2017 the better record went 5-3. Last year was an anomaly IMO.
Good post. Basketball is a sport where the best team will win the chip almost every time barring injuries which are less likely in basketball (KD in 2019, Kyrie 2015)Unfortunately, since hockey skews to being more luck-driven than say, basketball for example, the better team may only advance roughly 60% of the time. Basketball has the better team go through 80% of the time, and for hockey to achieve the same rate, the series would have to be a lot more games (which isn't realistic). Although, it gives more room to have upsets and the whole "Anything can happen" slogan the league is fond of.
EDIT: It would take a best of 51 for the NHL to replicate the same success rate for the better team.
Source: Part II: Rethinking our playoff philosophy (on the role of chance in the postseason) | Statsbylopez