Nothing great to be honest. Not sure he cracks top 15 for Arizona.Is emberson a good prospect?
Do you think he might play NHL games for NYR this year?Nothing great to be honest. Not sure he cracks top 15 for Arizona.
Bill Armstrong just stuffing draft picks into his cheeks like a squirrel.I feel like the Coyotes should have billboards on major highways in NHL cities like lawyers/law firms do.
"Signed a terrible contract?, we'll bail you out! Call Mr. Armstrong..."
Doubtful? Depends on injuries, etc, but Emberson isn't one of ARZ's more coveted prospects.Do you think he might play NHL games for NYR this year?
Not likely but you never know!Do you think he might play NHL games for NYR this year?
bern's been very busy@bernmeister Thinking it would only cost a 4th lol
Yes, I think he does. The 7th spot will be filled from within this season.Do you think he might play NHL games for NYR this year?
bern's been very busy
Now that I am catching up, I will require an apology and a retraction.
This type of intentional misrepresentation is how people's reputations get slammed.
I don't have a problem if someone takes me to task on something I actually said; that is not the case here.
Famously, I accurately said that if we go by the Marleau standard, NY has to give, to get fair value, two 4ths --- AND those 4ths should be in the same year, not 1 current and another delayed compensation.
Nowhere have I represented it would be a single 4th. It would be 2 4ths or equivalent if there was a package involved.
People said a 2nd, a 2nd, nothing else.
I said they could do a 3rd and a 5th in the same yr if a pair of 4ths were not available.
Posters must be able to rely on being quoted accurately.
If I had not posted the above extensively, I could understand it being a mistake or a typo.
However, to quote John Belushi,
"but nnnooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo."
that is not the case here.
____________
The actual deal involved a 2nd, yes, but a player who was a 3rd round selection went the other way. There is some loss of that player's shine since he was drafted, fair enuf, and would he go 3rd round again if redrafted? It's a moot pt b'c Rangers consider him useful and cheaper depth.
So I was right. The cost was not a full 2nd, without anything else of value to NY going the other way.
Only being able to see confirmed trade ari I thought This was a Chychrun tradeThese updates of past deals are rough. Thought the rangers reacquired nemeth.
If they don’t win they can sell some of their players and reacquire draft capital.Rags better hope they win a Cup in this tight window, they're jettisoning draft capital left and right.
I don’t think they’re as well positioned for that as they were the first time around they re-tooled. They don’t have guys like McDonagh and Miller to flip, a lot of their stars are on bad contracts on the wrong side of 30.If they don’t win they can sell some of their players and reacquire draft capital.
they have 2 guys who are barely over 30. Fine if you wanna call Panarin a bad contract because he's "on the wrong side of 30" but not sure you can call Kreider a bad contract. Guy is still a 30-35 goal scorer.I don’t think they’re as well positioned for that as they were the first time around they re-tooled. They don’t have guys like McDonagh and Miller to flip, a lot of their stars are on bad contracts on the wrong side of 30.
for multiple seasons. Result of the flat cap.Wow! So two 2nd round picks to get rid of $2.5M!
Yeah, but if you conservatively say the Rangers window with this core is the next two years, that puts him at 33 and you don’t know how that production continues to translate. Maybe he is still a ~35 goal scorer at that point, but I don’t think that’s a typical curve in that age bracket. Certainly not in terms of trade value, I don’t think teams would be banking on that. Same for Panarin and to a lesser extent Zibanejad.they have 2 guys who are barely over 30. Fine if you wanna call Panarin a bad contract because he's "on the wrong side of 30" but not sure you can call Kreider a bad contract. Guy is still a 30-35 goal scorer.
We won't need to do a full rebuild though in 2 years. Just some re-tooling. The team's core is very young. Kreider/Panarin will get traded.Yeah, but if you conservatively say the Rangers window with this core is the next two years, that puts him at 33 and you don’t know how that production continues to translate. Maybe he is still a ~35 goal scorer at that point, but I don’t think that’s a typical curve in that age bracket. Certainly not in terms of trade value, I don’t think teams would be banking on that. Same for Panarin and to a lesser extent Zibanejad.
Well you hope players they have who are in their early 20's continue to develop to make up for the decline in production if there is a decline in production. The bulk of their best players right now are not even in their mid 20's. That will be their core (if it isn't already).Yeah, but if you conservatively say the Rangers window with this core is the next two years, that puts him at 33 and you don’t know how that production continues to translate. Maybe he is still a ~35 goal scorer at that point, but I don’t think that’s a typical curve in that age bracket. Certainly not in terms of trade value, I don’t think teams would be banking on that.
It seems like, during a flat cap, you can keep a team financially afloat just by doing this all day.for multiple seasons. Result of the flat cap.
Maybe the players in that Covid year should have just taken the hit. Those who are no longer in the NHL got off easy. While those who are still in the NHL and new to the NHL are the ones paying for those others who got their full bag that season and not having to repay the owners.