Brownies
Registered User
Habs were BAD last year. Their shooting percentage was bad because they could not get close enough and get really good chances. Cannot blame bad luck on everything and twist the numbers. Price played bad, but not a lot of goalies in the history of the game could’ve played well with the way the D played last year.The problem with everyone's projection of the Habs going into this season is that they based it off of last year's result, in which Carey Price sported a .900 sv% and they shot with a league-low shooting%. If you adjust for 49 games of Price at .920 instead of .900, you're saving 29 goals. You adjust the shooting percentage to league average, you're looking at an additional 30. Add 59 goals to a -51 goal-differential team, and you've got a +8 team. A bubble team
Broke even on corsi, fenwick, scoring chances. Top-5 in high-danger corsi. They were never as bad as your narrative wanted them to be. More unlucky than bad
For the record, I had them as a 96-point team before the Pacioretty trade
I don’t think you can twist the number like you did, those bad ones were earned. The D has been stabilized with the young guys, the way the team forechecks fits our speedy guy. Kotkaniemi, Domi and Peca are playing like NHL centers should, which also helps of course. I don’t see a simple return to the mean for this team, the coaches and management have made the right changes for once.
Will it hold ? I think we’re too young and small but there’s hope in Montreal. I like this team.