egelband
Registered User
- Sep 6, 2008
- 15,927
- 14,558
This seems about right.Roussel is a disgusting player. He needs to go away.
That said, who doesn’t like a good pickle.
This seems about right.Roussel is a disgusting player. He needs to go away.
Suspension worthy? In my opinion, any sort of spear, bite, etc. should be an automatic suspension.
Must be related to Kadri.
I hate Roussel as much as anyone, but considering Vlasic looked to be going for the hair/ear pull I'm wondering what he thought was going to happen there when the guys arms are restrained.
Maybe watch what led up to the scrum. Rousell went after Vlasic down 4-0 with 40 seconds to go. Once Vlasic was finally able to start engaging Rousell the linesman got involved.Seeing that clip its not difficult to understand why he bit the hand
If I stuck my hand in someone's mouth while fighting/arguing with them, I'd be surprised if I didn't get bitten. I have no idea why this principle, which anyone with common sense recognizes, isn't supposed to apply in hockey.
Possibly. In any case, people freak out just as much when a player gets bit after jamming his gloved fingers in another player's mouth.Seeing that Vlasic's hand was in fist I don't think he was in the process of trying to stick into Roussel's mouth. You can try it yourself at home , try fitting your fist into your mouth.
Except hockey scrums aren't the real world, and Vlasic didn't put his hand in Rousell's mouth.If I stuck my hand in someone's mouth while fighting/arguing with them, I'd be surprised if I didn't get bitten. I have no idea why this principle, which anyone with common sense recognizes, isn't supposed to apply in hockey.
In what sense aren't hockey scrums the real world? What specifically about them should engender a different response?Except hockey scrums aren't the real world, and Vlasic didn't put his hand in Rousell's mouth.
You're kidding, right?In what sense aren't hockey scrums the real world? What specifically about them should engender a different response?
No. Rather than taking for granted that you're right, maybe you could answer my question.You're kidding, right?
How is this relevant? How does the fact that violence is sanctioned within a hockey game and discouraged elsewhere suggest that a player should be able to force his fingers into another player's mouth without the other player biting his fingers?You're kidding, right?
Hockey players aren't kept to the same standards as regular people. Unless you're in a mutual combat state/province you get battery/assault charges, which is why 99% of people avoid confrontation as much as possible. Hockey is a game predicated on physicality and adrenaline. Fights and scrums are going to happen. That doesn't give Rousell an excuse to bite.
I did. It's right below.No. Rather than taking for granted that you're right, maybe you could answer my question.
[mod]How is this relevant? How does the fact that violence is sanctioned within a hockey game and discouraged elsewhere suggest that a player should be able to force his fingers into another player's mouth without the other player biting his fingers?
You edited your post after I quoted it.I did. It's right below.
Now make a correlation between hockey fights and common law for civilians.
I'm aware of that. Should I conclude that you're okay with players biting the fingers of other players who jam rheir fingers into their mouths? If not, why not? What's the specific connection between violence being sanctioned differently within a sport and this particular form of violence being unacceptable?[mod]
Vlasic. Didn't. Put. His. Hand. In Rousell's. Mouth.
I meant pt 2 as in pt 2 of the licking incident from last years playoffs, but ok.Minus the talent, Stanley cup, overall ability to play the sport of hockey, but OK.