docbenton
Registered User
- Dec 6, 2014
- 1,825
- 650
Kuzmenko for 1st and 2nd...any takers?
39 goals, value contract at 5.5m for 2 years
39 goals, value contract at 5.5m for 2 years
Because there's a portion of the Canuck fanbase that is really out of touch with what management wants. A rebuild is simply not happening, but some still go about life as if it's going to.Why do you want to trade the best goal scorer the Canucks have ? The one that actually chose your team over others and you got him for free…
He was pretty much glued to Pettersson for majority of his time here.Did he play with Horvat at all and did they have any chemistry of so?
Miss the playoffs?? Oh come on, you don’t believe in this Vancouver team ?Its either trade him next year when they miss the playoffs, or the year after that when they miss the playoffs.
Either way they probably get a first and an underperforming prospect for him.
Sure. But NYR we can't fit him with our current cap. Don't see why Vancouver would want to toss him away. Doesn't make sense. I'll also throw in Lafreniere for a retained Kuzmenko.Kuzmenko for 1st and 2nd...any takers?
39 goals, value contract at 5.5m for 2 years
Why do the canucks do itKuzmenko for 1st and 2nd...any takers?
39 goals, value contract at 5.5m for 2 years
Retain? He's going to be outperforming his extensionOne of the few guys I'd trade the 8th overall for if the Canucks retained him down to 2.75. Perfect fit to jump start Kuznetsov
Retain? He's going to be outperforming his extension
This aged wellThis guy is poised for the biggest goal regression in the league next year. Vancouver would be smart to trade him. Flames should also trade Toffoli for the same reason.