Frankie Corrado got claimed for real by the Leafs
Few guys got claimed today, sadly someone didn't
no one is going to take our bad contracts.
better chance at winning powerball than someone claiming any of the clowns with the bad contracts.
The Isles goaltending is one of the reasons I can see them slipping this year and finishing behind the Flyers.
Bill Meltzer has a good write up on the MacDonald waiving. But here is why it was him and not others:
http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog/Bill...Cap-Straights-Even-Without-MacDonald/45/71448
Had the Flyers elected to waive Brandon Manning rather than MacDonald, the team would have gained $625,000 of cap space before Laughton's deal was figured in and wound up with just $345,000 -- not even enough to call up a player making the NHL minimum of $575,000 -- in the case of a non-LTIR injury.
So why waive MacDonald rather than Schenn? Two reasons: 1) With MacDonald making $5 million and having five seasons (including 2015-16) left on his deal, he is quite unlikely to be claimed, leaving him available for recall if and when the Flyers need him and have sufficient cap space; 2) Schenn, making $3.6 million with an expiring contract at the end of the season, stood at least a 50-50 chance of being claimed off waivers. While a waiver claim would take his entire cap hit off the books immediately, the Flyers would prefer to trade him to losing him for no return. Other teams with potential interest in Schenn, conversely, had no incentive to trade for him if there was a possibility of claiming him off of waivers instead.
Pittsburgh, Washington and the Rangers will be locks in the Metro. If they are healthy I would figure CBJ to be in the running as well.
I think a lot is going to have to break for the Flyers to make the playoffs. IMO
The Isles goaltending is one of the reasons I can see them slipping this year and finishing behind the Flyers.
I thought Pitt made the playoffs as the last team last year...also, I think Bonino is an upgrade over Sutter
You're right, I got them confused with Boston. Regardless, doesn't really change anything. It's still the same story as every other year, should make the playoffs due to top six scoring talent but don't stand a real chance at winning anything since everything else is lacking. Except this year the difference between that top six scoring and the rest of the roster is way more pronounced than ever before and the rest of the division looks as tough as it's been for a few seasons.
With Bonino/Sutter, like most people said when the trade happened it's not a big enough upgrade to matter for much. With Bonino you get a little more scoring (but still not enough to be anything more than secondary depth scoring) and less PK ability. The best part of that trade for Pittsburgh was the differences in contract. That difference materializes in the front office though, not on the ice per se. Besides, the biggest upgrade Bonino offers over Sutter is scoring ability and does a third line 40 to 50 point guy (at best) really matter when the rest of the forward group looks like Pittsburgh's does? Furthermore, does it really matter in the scope of their strengths and weaknesses?
Kessel isn't that much better than Neal, and Pittsburgh went nowhere with him in the lineup either.
*** not to derail the thread, but...
Neal hit 40 once, playing with Malkin, and hasn't scored more than 27 goals in any other season.
Kessel hasn't hit 40, but scored at least 30 five times, four of those playing with Matt Stajan or Tyler Bozak.
If I need goals, I'm looking to Kessel over Neal every time.
I don't know that Kessel is all that likely to be much more successful than Neal. Neal kinda came unwound in whatever crap culture Pittsburgh has, it's hard to imagine Phil working out there in the end. Lots of questions out of Toronto about his work ethic. He's also very one dimensional.