s3antana5757
Registered User
- Feb 15, 2014
- 2,450
- 1,057
In Europe it would be "AHN-ders." Here, "AN-Ders", as in "Andrew", is common.
It's "Byork", as we say, "beyond" without the "e".
Scandinavian name.
I agree with this. I see Frederic's ceiling as basically Backes.
We've heard the praise about Bjork from Boston but the praise goes the other way too. And he never thought about testing free agency.
Article by Kalman here.
I would also say the stats indicate a guy who will need at least a half season in the AHL, not a guy who jumps into the top 6 of an NHL team.
I think that's why he's asking why everyone is so excited, because Bjork is probably not a guy who steps into the bruins lineup at the beginning of next year. Truthfully I am excited about Bjork, but I'm not expecting any impact on the bruins team until 2018-19.
".........
Which while, its great to be excited about, I would also not pencil him into the bruins lineup next year. So, I could understand why someone could read this thread and think we are overly excited.
i already predicted bjork wont have a long career here... but hope im wrong. wishing him well and glad he signed
Wasn't being cynical, it was a sincere question. I feel like it's harder to gauge college players than CHL guys. I'm just worried because Vesey looked pretty subpar with the Rangers after all the hype surrounding him.
Not trying to out do ya but..
..I predicted Marchand would forever be an AHL`er
I know very little of Bjork other than a few viewings but is he exclusively a left wing or is he another Bruin who can shift to the dot if need be?
I've watched him a lot this past season and I don't see the Backes comparison at all. That gets mentioned a lot because he's a St Louis kid and Backes was his favorite player. He's got Backes' size, but he plays more like Joe Pavelski.
He had a great freshman year, but next year will be the real test. He won't have Luke Kunin on his wing anymore.
While that's true, CJ wasn't here the whole year yet he still didn't show any improvement under Butch...
I guess now it's Butch's fault?
File this under: Lazy, slow and/or entitled!
On the Bjork signing: Super job Donny. I hate "what could've been's) AB will be here for at least 3 years, that is 3 years to prove that he was worth it and belongs. While I don't think that he'll be the forward equivalent of McAvoy, I also don't expect him to step up and own a BB roster spot for a couple years.
Re Vesey: I don't think that his first NHL year is what he will be judged by. If by year three he hasn't blossomed then I'd say "bust" but not at least until then.
Re our prospects: It's now time for the front office to made some decisions and make some (trade) noise. I EXPECT to see some prospects moved for some veteran talent.
I got to watch a small number (6/7) of Frederic's games this year on TV (CBS sports and Big 10 Network carry a lot of hockey) and I agree with you, I'm not sure that Backes is the best comparison? Based on his numbers, and watching TF, Backes appears to have been a much more physical player in college.
In defense of Frederic's freshman year standing on it's own merit, I don't believe he played with Kunin until later in the season?
Frederic had 10 pts in his first 8 games and led Wisconsin in scoring, centering Max Zimmer and Dan Labosky, then broke his hand and missed 6 games (UW went 2-3-1 without him). When he first returned, he centered the 3rd line between Jason Ford and Will Johnson (Kunin was with another B's prospect, Cameron Hughes). Frederic worked his way up to the top line and Kunin, but he was able to do a lot of damage on his own as well.
I think it will be interesting to see how Frederic matures this season, as Kunin was a leader on that team. They also lost senior Grant Besse, but thought I had read that Granato has been recruiting well, so there should be some talent.
Wouldn't be surprised if Bjerknes spends time in Providence.
Ok...but what about Bjork?
Critiquing, analyzing and discussng is what we do here. Seeing how it plays out is boring.Seems like everyone is being over critiquing his skill set and where he should play. Let's see how it plays out
Critiquing, analyzing and discussng is what we do here. Seeing how it plays out is boring.
Seems like a good prospect. I don't see anything that changes the forecast of him being a good energy/two-way 3rd liner. Maybe he can be a Peverley type. People have to remember that he was 20 years old this season playing against younger weaker competition. Donato is another example of this. Donato should dominate he has been at Harvard forever, when he hits the AHL/NHL things will change, Vesey was significantly better than Donato in the NCAA and he was nothing to write home about after all the hype. I just hope Bjork can bring some speed and jump to the 3rd line at some point, it would not be fair to project him as a top 2 line player.
Not all prospects are created equal. Who expected Carlo to make the roster as a rookie?Love that he a bruin but lets hope we remember what happened to Danton when given a shot early think Bork will need some time in Providence